Jon Rappaport provides a very good article on this. >>"They tested how many viruses are needed until a PCR test shows a positive result." The PCR test isn't really germane to what I posted, since the PCR is incapable of identifying the Covid-19 virus. The inventor of the PCR Test was Dr. Kary B. Mullis, who received a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this in 1994. In an interview, Dr. Mullis explained: >**“The PCR is NOT to be used for diagnosis.”** He said PCR was NOT to be used for a test (and **the leaflet coming with the test even says this!**). In January, Prof. Drosden in Germany was tinkering using an OLD SARS VIRUS and threw this test together using Mullis' PCR method! Right away, you should realize it’s **NOT** a COVID-19 test – but a **general coronavirus test** (many strains are mild colds and flu). In fact, 15% of colds have long been considered to be coronavirus. Scientists at Connecticut’s Public Health Laboratory said they’ve discovered a flaw in a manufacturer’s testing system for the coronavirus that’s used by labs around the country (their particular study found 62% false positives). And this is a under-estimate in which other findings indicate a 89% to 94% false positives. Again, the Jon Rappaport article is talking about Covid-19 isolates, to which the CDC admits they have not found. PCR testing will find a family of similar viruses, but will not isolate Covid-19. The real pandemic is turning out to be the PCR Test itself.