“quantified” in that phrase means the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus
My dictionary translates quantify into "quantifizieren", meaning you can put an exact number on it (it is countable, not just "many"). Maybe it's different in English, but they needed an exact number for the experiments, so "countable" makes sense. They tested how many viruses are needed until a PCR test shows a positive result.
Anyway, the CDC has used the RNA of the virus instead of the whole virus for these tests. They have the RNA created out of an open access database with 200,000 RNA samples of the virus from all over the world. To sequence the RNA to fill the database, they needed isolates.
Maybe 100% of the western scientists who filled the Database are corrupt cause of Big Pharma, and 100% of the Chinese scientists are corrupt too cause of CCP, but the "there is no virus" theory needs 100% corrupt scientists from Russia, South Asia, South America, Africa and the rest of the world too - not really likely.
Jon Rappaport provides a very good article on this.
>"They tested how many viruses are needed until a PCR test shows a positive result."
The PCR test isn't really germane to what I posted, since the PCR is incapable of identifying the Covid-19 virus. The inventor of the PCR Test was Dr. Kary B. Mullis, who received a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this in 1994. In an interview, Dr. Mullis explained:
“The PCR is NOT to be used for diagnosis.”
He said PCR was NOT to be used for a test (and the leaflet coming with the test even says this!).
In January, Prof. Drosden in Germany was tinkering using an OLD SARS VIRUS and threw this test together using Mullis' PCR method! Right away, you should realize it’s NOT a COVID-19 test – but a general coronavirus test (many strains are mild colds and flu). In fact, 15% of colds have long been considered to be coronavirus.
Scientists at Connecticut’s Public Health Laboratory said they’ve discovered a flaw in a manufacturer’s testing system for the coronavirus that’s used by labs around the country (their particular study found 62% false positives). And this is a under-estimate in which other findings indicate a 89% to 94% false positives.
Again, the Jon Rappaport article is talking about Covid-19 isolates, to which the CDC admits they have not found. PCR testing will find a family of similar viruses, but will not isolate Covid-19. The real pandemic is turning out to be the PCR Test itself.
(post is archived)