I have had my doubts about Admiral Rogers for a longtime. More than two years. First, I am not going to watch this; it is a black boomerang aimed directly at us to dispirit our movement. I have never really understood why Rogers has been such a vaunted member of anons and I have been following Q since the beginning. The thing that disturbed me early on was when the call with Seymour Hersh about the murder of Seth Rich was leaked by that attorney. During that call, Hersh refers to Rogers as a motherfer. That has always stayed with me. I mostly trust Hersh--though he admits he's been more or less shut down on the writing of his Cheney book and I don't know what that's about and I heard in an interview that Hersh was really angry about the leaked call because he was working on a story and that leak compromised all his sourcing--whether that is true or not, I don't know.
I think the reason people think he's a good guy is because he warned Trump he was being spied on right after the 2016 election.
Also, he's the guy that found the FBI abusing the 702 process and shut it down. He also had it audited, and that's the only reason we know any details about what Comey was up to.
Here's what bothers me about that warning. Rogers knew in April of the FISA abuses - waited until after election to notify Trump. That looks to me like a DS move to keep at least some of their people in the loop. I hope I'm wrong - Rogers was/is a hero to many.
Yep, covering his own ass after the fact.
Yes, I know that's the standard line--but we have only Q's word on that and Q is often writing for a broad audience, many of whom are bad actors. And yes, good point on the second. And also I suppose it could be optics or disinfo. We are living in the shadows!
Thanks, something to ponder while going forward and looking back.
(post is archived)