Wait, he said “a peaceful transition “of” military power”, not a transition “to” military power. Those are not the same thing.
He did. And that’s why I’m not getting overly excited but I still find it rather strange. If he were truly going out of his way to make sure everybody understood this was just for security purposes he would’ve use the word security more, I might have to try to avoid using the term “military power.” That phrasing has weight to it. So is that what we are looking at? This is an exertion of military power? That’s a lot different from providing security against terrorist threats. I don’t know, if there were a real interview or asking real questions maybe we would’ve gotten some answers but, as usual, the media is garbage.
Agreed. I don’t trust anything. The people we see on MSM are puppets. If there truly is some secret shit going down, they have done a damn good job about keeping it secret, aside from the 30,000 “boots” (not counting the fat lesbian NG larders) on the ground.
Yep.
(post is archived)