Sounds like Editorializing to me. That means his Section 230 protections are null and void.
Sounds like Editorializing to me. That means his Section 230 protections are null and void.
If 230 is void, one of the Dakotas is smart being the first to sue Fakebook for censorship.
If 230 is void, one of the Dakotas is smart being the first to sue Fakebook for censorship.
You don't understand. Section 230 (an addendum of the Telecommunications Act of 1934) shields websites from liability as long as they do not Editorialize the content. If a site does that, they are considered a Publisher and no longer protected and are subject to normal libel and other laws for content.
You don't understand. Section 230 (an addendum of the Telecommunications Act of 1934) shields websites from liability as long as they do not Editorialize the content. If a site does that, they are considered a Publisher and no longer protected and are subject to normal libel and other laws for content.
(post is archived)