Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

This morning I listened to a video by Jordan Sather who questioned both the statements about "Pope arrested" and "Trump signed Insurrection Act." He questioned both pointing to the source that Lin wood got the first "fact" and discredited Parkes and a couple of other folks putting out the Insurrection act story. I posted both of these stories on this board, not claiming they were true, but also not doing enough research to responsibly question them. I want to own my part in pushing out disinformation. This is a formal apology for "gaslighting" anyone. I will do my part to critically challenge, question, and dig deeper to shed light on any statements of facts.

Thanks to those on here who have pushed me to do better.

This morning I listened to a video by Jordan Sather who questioned both the statements about "Pope arrested" and "Trump signed Insurrection Act." He questioned both pointing to the source that Lin wood got the first "fact" and discredited Parkes and a couple of other folks putting out the Insurrection act story. I posted both of these stories on this board, not claiming they were true, but also not doing enough research to responsibly question them. I want to own my part in pushing out disinformation. This is a formal apology for "gaslighting" anyone. I will do my part to critically challenge, question, and dig deeper to shed light on any statements of facts. Thanks to those on here who have pushed me to do better.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (71).
[–] • 2 pts

Yup...it's been a long road for most here, but normies' heads are going to explode when they get it all at once.

For a while we had shills on the other boards who were screaming that if our information wasn't "accurate" we shouldn't post it. How can we possibly post "only accurate" things? We were trying to make sense of Q posts and put pieces together. It took all the autists/anons, a piece of knowledge here, another there, to make sense of what Q was posting. Some information was thrown out, some kept, much was discussed and put on a shelf until more information came out to form a better picture.

The whole point of Q was to introduce thoughts/ideas/speculations and examine those things collectively...to dig.

That shrill screeching about only posting "facts" was just a tactic to shut speculative information down. That is gaslighting.

You good....

[–] • 2 pts

Thank you. I was on Reddit when there were 70,000 of us and then Voat and now here (with only 700 or so of us). Connecting the dots means looking critically at all of the information. For me, I want to be sure to frame the information better as "confirmed fact" or "unconfirmed information" worth researching, questioning, and connecting with other assumptions and inferences. As Q said, we need to think "logically." You are rights; ANY shrill screaming to not share information unless it is absolutely confirmed, mens we would all wait around until things are finished to even begin thinking about them in light of other facts. Thanks for the reminder:)

[–] • 1 pt

"...ANY shrill screaming to not share information unless it is absolutely confirmed, mens we would all wait around until things are finished to even begin thinking about them in light of other facts."

Yup. :)