So what was your point??
InSimply that given how long ago this was made and made to sound imminent is that its 50/50 could be true could be false . So now that I've stated that again is that 0k?
Just wondering why you bother.
You've been hearing it for 10 years, as you say so yourself, so have you been complaining about it for that long as well?
Wow. You're investing an inordinate amount time on this. Funny too because the very first post on this thread says something quite similar talking about the source being discredited yet you seem to have no issue with that poster. I wonder why? Do you feel threatened by my opinion?
(post is archived)