Illegally obtained evidence doesn't hold up in court so in this case (assuming) they have the evidence and then need to pretend they obtained it legally.
Something along the lines of "we had to take the laptops to protect the data and we had to look to see if it was tampered with, but then we found this..."
Maybe they had a warrant.
But this is war, so in this situation, it may be legally admissable.
It can be admissible when they subpoena from the server, plus all her emails are stored somewhere as government records
he noted that military has it (special forces). it will be used in a military setting where it will be admissible. think, tribunal. rules of evidence are different there. the wicked monster pelosi knows she is doomed and it terrifies her.
(post is archived)