He has the evidence that shows the DNC files were downloaded and not hacked.
He has the evidence that shows the DNC files were downloaded and not hacked.
Something new? More than his prior reporting on the file transfer rate speeds being local media vs internet hacked? That's nearly 4 year old news, they are just now getting around to him? I would think something more recent or feared by the DS has added to the urgency in their attempt(s) on Binney? Or are they trying to make Binney an example of repercussions for not towing their line to others in the field? IDK.
Something new? More than his prior reporting on the file transfer rate speeds being local media vs internet hacked? That's nearly 4 year old news, they are just now getting around to him? I would think something more recent or feared by the DS has added to the urgency in their attempt(s) on Binney? Or are they trying to make Binney an example of repercussions for not towing their line to others in the field? IDK.
Who knows what else Binney has on them.
But he has the evidence on the DNC that to date hasn't been presented in a court. Perhaps Durham has it from Binney now and this attack is revenge
Who knows what else Binney has on them.
But he has the evidence on the DNC that to date hasn't been presented in a court. Perhaps Durham has it from Binney now and this attack is revenge
(post is archived)