Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

889

President Donald Trump declined to sign the coronavirus relief and stimulus bill on Saturday evening as he pushed for higher stimulus payments of $2000 rather than $600, meaning millions of Americans would exhaust their unemployment benefits.

Two unemployment benefits programs expired at midnight on Sunday morning, as the Wall Street Journal noted:

President Donald Trump declined to sign the coronavirus relief and stimulus bill on Saturday evening as he pushed for higher stimulus payments of $2000 rather than $600, meaning millions of Americans would exhaust their unemployment benefits. Two unemployment benefits programs expired at midnight on Sunday morning, as the Wall Street Journal noted:

(post is archived)

[–] • 7 pts

For good reasons.

[–] • 1 pt

I believe Trump is slow walking the bill. As long as he hasn't vetoed it, CONgress critters can't do a vote over ride of a Veto, right?

So he hasn't vetoed it, and he hasn't approved it......he is keeping it in suspense.

Now supposedly Piglosi will introduce on Monday (tomorrow) a stand alone bill that will give all Americans $2,000. However she drafted it to be approved by unanimous vote. So if only one Commie says "nay", then the bill is sunk.

I believe Trump is able (and has done before) an Exec Order to extend unemployment benefits again.

So there are ways around CONgressional Fraud Bill.

[–] • 7 pts

Wrong Headline ... it should be "Trump fights for the peoples interests".
Because 80% of the Relief Bill earmarked for Special Interests ... which is bull shit.

[–] • 6 pts

This is why I stopped reading Breitbart. They have succumbed to the deep state.

[–] • 2 pts

Agree, Andrew is turning in his grave. They should call it something other than Breitbart because it has nothing to do with him now. It's just another mainstream media propaganda outlet.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I agree - Breitbart has definitely changed - and not for the better.

[–] • 0 pt

The article itself seems okay, the headline is misleading though.

[–] • 0 pt

I copy/pasta'd the headline. Yes, it certainly could have been written better.

[–] • -1 pt

Not your fault. You post enough links that you can't possibly be expected to read/watch them all before posting.

I appreciate what you do.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Nice seeing your "softer" side, Mod :-)

[–] • 0 pt

I read most, read half of some, skim a few. I don't want to post crap, you guys wouldnt let me live it down! And I don't want to clutter the page with unwanted tripe.

Screening all the headlines and articles that don't make the cut for me to post is the most exhausting, well, except replying to the grievance comments. Lol!

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts

The criminal democrats were throwing a crumb at the american people but put out a buffet for their friends and foreign countries. The democrats hate you and they hate america. If they complete this coup the country is fucking done.

[–] • 3 pts

Why would he sign it?

It gives almost everything to foreign nations and very little to you.

Don't pay so much attention to anti-Trump sites. They always play on your doubts and fears.

[–] • 0 pt

Breitbart is an anti-Trump site?! That would be news to me!

I know why Trump isn't signing and I am in full agreement with him. The article doesn't shit on Trump, it only details the shitty situation and the likelihood Dems will of course blame him for not signing the bill containing every black pill they and the GOPe could fit into it.

[–] • 1 pt

The header is all that many people read (me included sometimes).

It suggests that Trump is dicking people.

I've seen other stuff put out by Breitbart that isn't exactly pro-Trump.

[–] • 1 pt

Most of us here know what is going on with this bill. Looks like I will need to vette the post headlines here. That headline has precipitated more feedback on this post than the article itself!

When I read the headline I knew the story behind it, and that this situation was not Trump's fault. The Dems dragged their feet forever on this bill, then once they thought Biden won, they quickly assembled the +/-6000 pages of Porkulus with the snickering GOPe and tried to drive it up America's ass. Trump stopped that, and rightfully so, protecting 80% of the funds that would not put America first.

[–] • 1 pt

They also blasted Lin Wood recently. I don’t trust em, they’re sketchy af.

[–] • 1 pt

To me, (((brietbart))) glows.

[–] • 0 pt

They all glow to varying degrees. Sometimes it's because of a few reporters, other times its the editor and/or CEOs. But we use discernment here, nothing gets by the anons. Even a glowing article can reveal a nugget of truth when scrutinized.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The bill was a shitshow! Glad it was vetoed! Thank you

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

What goddamned nigger wrote this headline?

[–] • 2 pts

JOEL B. POLLAK from Breitbart.

[–] • 2 pts

Typical Breitbart bullshit headline. Unemployment benefits are paid by states - what ran out is the federal covid bonus. If states pay shit level of unemployment it's on them.

[–] • 1 pt

Fuck'em most are just riding the wave anyway. Why work they say? Make more money off the feds

[–] • 1 pt

The pork is designed to re-establish their access to children. Why else would Cambodia, a pedo vacation destination, get funding? The money will also probably be used to build Planned Parenthood clinics and gender reassignment surgery centers. Anything to satisfy their god Baphomet.

[–] • 1 pt

Feeding Evil worldwide. These people are sick.

[–] • 0 pt

YEAH ITS LIKE NO SHIT NOBODY IN AMERICA WITH HALF A BRAIN WANTED THAT TO BE SIGNED. IDIOTS.

[–] • 0 pt

Headline seems un legit

[–] • 0 pt

I copy/pasta'd the headline. It could have been written much better. The article was okay though.