Lmao I did read the first article. I clicked the parler icon and my parley of the first article is where it took me. I am tjccrider there.
Here's something not mentioned : 3 USC ch. 1 sec. 2 (off top of my head) "Whenever an election is held to choose Electors and it fails to make a choice on the day prescribed by law (sec. 1- nov. 3rd this year) the legislature of such State may appoint the Electors in a manner it directs." So vote counts that were not certified on Nov. 3rd did not make the choice on the day prescribed by law therefore state legislatures were free to appoint as they saw fit from Nov. 4th onward.
Lmao I did read the first article. I clicked the parler icon and my parley of the first article is where it took me. I am tjccrider there.
Here's something not mentioned : 3 USC ch. 1 sec. 2 (off top of my head) "Whenever an election is held to choose Electors and it fails to make a choice on the day prescribed by law (sec. 1- nov. 3rd this year) the legislature of such State may appoint the Electors in a manner it directs." So vote counts that were not certified on Nov. 3rd did not make the choice on the day prescribed by law therefore state legislatures were free to appoint as they saw fit from Nov. 4th onward.
(post is archived)