Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

I mean I get that an admin haughtily telling me what to do with my community would piss me off and make me want to leave, but...

Here you are on poal which by default is non-anon. And the reason you supposedly started up here is because an admin on the other site threatened to take away your anonymity.

What have you gained through making this move? Other than telling Putt (or the skin-walker that ate him) to go fuck himself?

You are welcome to stay, or better yet use both poal and voat. I'm just trying to parse out the reason for coming here.

I mean I get that an admin haughtily telling me what to do with my community would piss me off and make me want to leave, but... Here you are on poal which by default is non-anon. And the reason you supposedly started up here is because an admin on the other site threatened to take away your anonymity. What have you gained through making this move? Other than telling Putt (or the skin-walker that ate him) to go fuck himself? You are welcome to stay, or better yet use both poal and voat. I'm just trying to parse out the reason for coming here.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 0 pt 6y

I think the anon/non anon thing is a smokescreen for the real issues. The question seems to be more " Who gets a voice?" Not everyone can handle free speech, so how do we handle a free speech forum? Where do we draw the lines? Who draws the lines? And these are good questions. I think to be viable, free speech has to be based in good conduct and ethics, and that is what no one really teaches anymore. So, like everything else; We have to rebuild our communications structures. I think that is what is happening here. They are saying Q still endorses VOAT and never changed anything. It's smoke and mirrors around here.