![What do you think? [584x719 - 63KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/xmnAsx.jpg){kind=link}
ISTJ seems fairly accurate: https://archive.today/UvJK6
However, I haven't done one of these tests in 20 years or so because I am many of their supposed "types", but all at once and to varying degrees when the situation demands one to be more important and dominant than others.
Did it again just now and it said I am INTJ-T, which is also fairly accurate. https://archive.today/e14aN
This test, like most tests, tell me more about the one who has composed the test rather than the test telling me about myself; most of the questions are written very poorly, are worded in a manner that requires several unfounded assumptions to be true (or false), and the degrees of response to a question often do not fit with the manner in which the question is posed so there is no possible selection to be made other than a -neutral- response.
most of the questions are written very poorly
Yes, they really ought to explain exactly what they mean. The people who make tests seem have a phobia for making long explanations. Coming to think of it my brother had an idea that it is the people who critique the questions are the PCs.
From what I can gather from your activities here, I would say INTJ is very accurate.
Also people need to understand that MBTI is a "skeleton" of your personality, you could meet two people of the same type who are very different from each other.
(post is archived)