Journal Retracts 2 Articles for Being “unethical, scientifically flawed, and based on racist ideas and agenda” | Poal: Say what you want.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

744

• (+8/-0)

Journal Retracts 2 Articles for Being “unethical, scientifically flawed, and based on racist ideas and agenda” (retractionwatch.com)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (5).

[–] • 2 pts

you can retract fact

Not how it works.

link