From Twatter: "Hypersonic missiles can't dive underwater"; "To further pontificate, aircraft carriers are big and flashy, but ballistic missile subs are actually terrifying from a strategic planning and grand strategy standpoint. Excellent pivot from the western powers."

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

•

From Twatter: "Hypersonic missiles can't dive underwater"; "To further pontificate, aircraft carriers are big and flashy, but ballistic missile subs are actually terrifying from a strategic planning and grand strategy standpoint. Excellent pivot from the western powers." (twitter.com)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (5).

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Laughs in Status-6 'Kanyon' 100megaton underwater autonomous tsar Bomba ♥️

The Russians are ahead of us on this curve. Maybe. Although I am reading news that the USN is prepping similar underwater drone and UUV swarms.

Also status-6 is completely modular in it's payload, it doesn't "have" to have the tsunami nuke on board, it could carry torpedos to launch, or drone swarms, and with a nuclear power source it could be in standby mode for years on the bottom of the ocean, waiting for a command to execute.

link

/s/Politics

created ago

About this sub

This default sub is for "political news" (link posts only).

You have to provide a link/source to an article/archive (no more than a week old).

No screenshots, images of texts, cartoons, memes...

More related subs:

For political memes and cartoons:

For political videos:

For political opinions:

For political satire:

For Q stuff please use:

For Election related stuff: