Well, there's that. Then, there is the fact that you chose your online nick to be SethButtstein.
We didn't chose it for you. You actually spent brain cells on that work of pure genius.
I'm buggin ya. Yes, anything that reads like "here's our saviours" needs to be called out. All I'm getting at here is that we need to stop waiting for the magical Jesus to come save us.
We are utterly alone, no one is coming to save us.
There are a lot of strategies we can use. We can do what they new young democrats did and audition candidates and pick someone that matches the messaging: they chose AOC. If you know anything about marketing, you know that she will be a very very high frontrunner for the democratic presidential candidate. She is so on message and so perfectly on point, most of the people on this board have no fucking clue how unbelievably dangerous she is.
Anyway, we can do something like that where we lazer focus our limited resources.
Or, we can go the spray and pray approach and do the bayesian filtering numbers game. Signal boost (to our people only) all of the possible rising stars. We need a PERPETUAL roster of leadership at all levels of the organization and capabilities to step in and keep the ball in play. Instead of focusing on the one magical negro to save us all, we build an unlimited army of potential leadership that is all flawed in some way but all that can make a play or two and then be swapped out for a new one.
The obvious pros cons are: the first one is effective use of limited resources because we neither have resources nor time. However, the first one has a very high failure rate. The second option is a better long term option but it requires enormous resources that we don't have (yet).
So, the next question is, how do you make a decision. There are a lot of methodologies you can use, I have a few I like, but that is best left for another venue.
What I'm getting at is, quit posting like a fucking loser. Start thinking critically and strategicaly. Losing is not useful, only wining is.
>Well, there's that. Then, there is the fact that you chose your online nick to be SethButtstein.
>We didn't chose it for you. You actually spent brain cells on that work of pure genius.
Sure, I needed to create username because I change frequently. I don't think it sounds particularly reverent of jews. lol
>What I'm getting at is, quit posting like a fucking loser. Start thinking critically and strategicaly. Losing is not useful, only wining
I'm merely pointing out that these things will not work, that's not being a loser. Being a loser is pretending that something is effective when it isn't, then telling everyone to do that.
Being a winner is identifying the clearest path to victory, then doing it no matter what the cost.
You're still not ready. Maybe you need another 10 years of getting it up the ass. The problem with that is you'll be even more demoralized with even less potential and more of us will fade into old age. We are an old race and time is of the essence, we don't have time for these games.
If you could raise your hand tomorrow and get rid of these assholes at no cost or risk to yourself, you would. It's really that simple.
I'm willing to entertain this. You are dangerously close to engaging the other circuitry in your head that can help move this game forward.
So, there is a technique I developed where I trained my tech teams to be brutally honest during evaluation. And by brutally honest, no one here has any clue how rough the language could get. But, what I discovered were two things:
a) The techs just dropped all swearing and all confrontational language and became hugely collaborative.
b) There was also a flaw in the training, and the flaw was this: the team ended up ONLY discussing negatives and problems. I had to teach them to to include enough positive feedback to balance out the negativity because psychologically the human mind needs both goal posts in order how to adjust course.
So far, you have engaged ONLY on the negative. Yes, we know. Nothing ever works, everything has been tried, it's all pointless, get your guns, I'm pretending to not be a glowie, godoaterror.gif.
Got it.
I have engaged on the positive and could expand further on the positive, which would include the two key strategies for filtering for leadership and at least one key strategy on how to think about decision making during the process.
Why don't you engage on the positive and propose a few alternative ways on what we ought to do, organize, engage, etc.
Let's hear some of that.
>So far, you have engaged ONLY on the negative. Yes, we know. Nothing ever works, everything has been tried, it's all pointless, get your guns, I'm pretending to not be a glowie, godoaterror.gif.
And there you are, the immovable dilemma. Why did they make it illegal? lol
In combat sports, it's really easy to figure out how to win. Simply do the things that are deemed illegal.
Want to beat a world class Judoka? Don't bother with Judo, punch him in the face and stiff arm him the whole time. lol
(post is archived)