WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

Cast as a "temper tantrum" by breitbart (breitbart.com)

The rep in question, some women, claimed all her own bills had been ignored in committee.

But really this is the GOP playbook of grandstanding for its union bosses in the DNC.

Any new party formed should pass a bill that allows them to earmark some bill as "censurable".

Those going to sign, agree beforehand. Those who fail or change their mind last minute get an automatic censure.

Party makes anyone accepted into the party, agree to step down/retire if they're censured.

Stops this shit cold.

Cast as a "temper tantrum" by [breitbart](https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/23/lone-gop-state-senator-stops-arizona-bill-to-limit-automatic-mailing-of-absentee-ballots-in-temper-tantrum/) The rep in question, some women, claimed all her own bills had been ignored in committee. But really this is the GOP playbook of grandstanding for its union bosses in the DNC. Any new party formed should pass a bill that allows them to earmark some bill as "censurable". Those going to sign, agree *beforehand*. Those who fail or change their mind last minute get an automatic censure. Party makes anyone accepted into the party, agree to step down/retire if they're censured. Stops this shit cold.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Birthright citizenship is much more specific: It's a relatively modern invention where the mother just has to give birth here. Every other country requires more stake than that to be a citizen, like one or both parents also being citizens and/or renouncing any alternate citizenships upon reaching adulthood.

Problem is a lot of people here don't have any loyalty to this country. They'll flee as soon as shit goes south. All of the illegal immigrants definitely will, and quite a few of their anchor babies will too. Then there's the jews and their escape plan...

[–] 0 pt

I'm just not convinced birthright citizenship is the source of problems.

They're gonna come regardless.

And removing birthright citizenship opens up a can worms that will be misused, and is likely intended for misuse.

That said I don't see why it shouldn't be massively reinforced:

Both parents have to be birthright citizens. And both of their parents have to be birth right citizens.

And we only apply it retroactively, starting in say, 1980-1990. So if someone was born here in say, 2015, and both their parents are citizens, but one of their grandparents came here in 1981, then its a no go, then still a foreigner.

Of course all of this assumes we'd be deporting a significant number of people beforehand.

Or that immigration in its current form is remotely okay, when its not.