Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

136

Cast as a "temper tantrum" by breitbart (breitbart.com)

The rep in question, some women, claimed all her own bills had been ignored in committee.

But really this is the GOP playbook of grandstanding for its union bosses in the DNC.

Any new party formed should pass a bill that allows them to earmark some bill as "censurable".

Those going to sign, agree beforehand. Those who fail or change their mind last minute get an automatic censure.

Party makes anyone accepted into the party, agree to step down/retire if they're censured.

Stops this shit cold.

Cast as a "temper tantrum" by [breitbart](https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/23/lone-gop-state-senator-stops-arizona-bill-to-limit-automatic-mailing-of-absentee-ballots-in-temper-tantrum/) The rep in question, some women, claimed all her own bills had been ignored in committee. But really this is the GOP playbook of grandstanding for its union bosses in the DNC. Any new party formed should pass a bill that allows them to earmark some bill as "censurable". Those going to sign, agree *beforehand*. Those who fail or change their mind last minute get an automatic censure. Party makes anyone accepted into the party, agree to step down/retire if they're censured. Stops this shit cold.

(post is archived)

[–] • 16 pts (edited )

WOMEN ALWAYS are fake conservatives!!!

The two women federal senators last year CONSTANTLY voted against Trump!

Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Susan Collins (R-ME)! Vile!

Bitches!

Murkoski and Collins STOPPED obamacare repeal !! fucking bitches!! RINOS!

Murkowski and Collins: The Two Women Who Helped Sink Obamacare Repeal:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/murkowski-collins-who-are-two-women-gop-senators-who-helped-n787711

Anti Kavenaugh! :

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/collins-murkowski-key-votes-kavanaugh-confirmation/572407/

The Supreme court woman ALWAYS voted against Trump.

NEVER TRUST WOMEN! They are socialists!

The people trump had to keep firing , are overrepresented as female tokens he gave a chance, too, like Valerie Boyd from DHS.

In 2016 white employed suburban women were almost 400% more likely than white employed suburban men to vote Democrat! (Pew Research).

In 2020 its not as high, but still they say OVERALL, white women, all employment status, all living locations, voted MAJORITY for socialism, but the same males were dramatically over 75% leaning Trump.

WOMEN vote for socialism

Women subvert if elected as republicans.

Trump appointed CIA Gina Haspel is a Trump hating bitch, like most women: https://twitter.com/RealMattCouch/status/1327338803212787714?s=19

Women do not belong in government.

I think 5 women flipped from Republican to DEMOCRAT in congress right after election in recent years. They stole republican votes, magically won, then switched party as soon as entering Washington, to become democrats and not lose future seniority.

NEVER TRUST WOMEN!

[–] • 4 pts

Yes. Like my sister. She works in politics. She’s a “Republican”

[–] • 1 pt

it's literally impossible to be a woman in politics and be a true conservative. true conservatism means women don't even get the vote, let alone be involved in politics.

[–] • -2 pt

I trust my mother

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

I trust mine as well, but she's too compassionate sometimes. She treats everything to include the fucking deer that dick up my farm as if they are her children or something sometimes.

I don't doubt women's involvement in politics is why Western countries keep coddling illegal murdering immigrants as well- too compassionate, to the detriment of their own society.

[–] • 1 pt

fair warning: she could be jivin’ too.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

State Sen. Michelle Ugente-Rita (R-23) also voted no, a parliamentary maneuver which allows her to bring the bill up again for another floor vote before the current legislative session ends.

It looks like there may be another chance.

In general, women need to be removed from politics... right after the 19th is repealed.

[–] • 4 pts

Especially ones with hyphenated names. The only thing worse is a male with a hyphenated name.

[–] • 1 pt

Hyphenated names are proof that the person is a feminazi cunt or a feminazi supporter. I've never been wrong about that assumption so far.

[–] • 4 pts

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R-AZ) has already signed two other election integrity bills into law so far this year: One prohibits private funding of election administration, and another removes dead people from the voter rolls.

I would have thought the latter was automatic? It's cheating by design without it.

That being said, with the original post, fuckwits voting with their emotions and what they personally want, rather than listening to the people they've been elected by, needs to fuck the hell off.

[–] • 3 pts

is there a list being compiles somewhere of all the republicans in federal and state legislatures that need to be replaced?

[–] • 2 pts

republicans in federal and state legislatures that need to be replaced?

with street light decorations or do you mean with new candidates?

[–] • 2 pts

Both. The former prior to the latter.

[–] • 1 pt

Is All Of Them an accurate enough list?

[–] • 1 pt

This GOP cunt is a closet libtard.

[–] • 0 pt

This GOP cunt is a closet libtard.

Thanks Masato. Figured.

[–] • 1 pt

As much as the right slobbered on Amy Coney Barrett, Ididn't trust her then and I don't trust her now. She cucked her husband and turned him into her bitch. Women of faith are suppose to honor their husbands, not turn them into passive bitches.

[–] • 1 pt

Ididn't trust her then and I don't trust her now.

You and me both. So that makes two. I wonder how common that opinion is. Probably a lot more common than you or I know.

And thats just it. They can claim the right is "slobbering" or "wild" for anyone. And it could be a full 90% against that person, but we wouldn't know it.

People need to talk more among each other so each of us can better grasp where our side actually stands and not like CNN-lite (fox) or one of the crypto-grifters like tucker control the discussion.

We also need a central hub for organizing our own counter-shilling to put up resistance to narrative pushes on our side (again like how they're trying to recover tucker's rep). We're still in a war of perceptions, whether you think thats a good thing (non-accelerationist), or a bad thing (accelerationist).

Need to hollow out and co-opt the civnats to destroy the states ability to use that as a division-point or sink for the rights political momentum. And need to co-opt the "conservative" moniker, so any attack on us appears to be an attack against the whole of the right. Political power lays not in the best argument, but where the crowds (moderates) sympathies lay. To rhetorically attack is insufficient, we also must provoke proverbial attack against us.

[–] • 1 pt

I have a bad habit of listening to conservative talk radio on the way to work and on the way home, can't stand the Nigger music and I'm inclined to believe they are both the same side of the coin. both sides tend to terrorize us with their panic porn. Hugh Hewitt is by far the worse. He lies, sides with liberal opinions but claims to be a conservative. On April 7, 2021 (8-9 AM) he states that the covid vaccine is just like the polio vaccine. the polio vaccine was a weakened/dead virus injection where the covid is an mRNA vaccine. mRNA is a DNA modifying vaccine except for J&J , it's a viral vector vaccine or at least that's what they are telling us. either way; Hewitt lied to his listeners. The only thing many "Conservatives" are conserving is their lifestyle. sorry to go off on a tear , but I'm just about sick of both sides. Limbaugh was the only one that was consistent in his message. He's gone and the rest can't convincingly imitate him. You will notice that all the anti-liberal mouthpieces have a twitter, facebook, reddit and every other liberal format button on their pages. railing against twitter/facebook but still using their service all the while calling liberals "hypocrites" .Then Mike Lindell comes out with a free speech platform where porn,profanity etc. is prohibited. I know TLDR , and if you got this far , thank you for listening to my rant. what you said is so much what I think , it stoked a fire.

[–] • 0 pt

I know TLDR , and if you got this far , thank you for listening to my rant. what you said is so much what I think , it stoked a fire.

You're welcome WD. Reddit and other platforms of that nature are absolutely trash. I do encourage people so inclined to continue using them simply because it interrupts their echo chamber. Even small victories are victories.

Like most of the people still let on air, or given a platform, Hewitt is probably in place to act, unwittingly or wittingly, as the fall guy, as the other half of the "aisle", to mirror the other side's argument. It's one party, pandering to both 'sides'.

I mostly use left/right, conservative/liberal still out of habit, but you're correct that it isn't all that productive. The progressive party (standard DNC+GOP machine combine) likes to slide society one way because they're focused on the policy outcome of values, while the public is focused on the labels, and I think its important to inject some chaos there and start forming microparties of 2-3 issues, inverting the "party->policies / public->labels" arrangement of politics. The power of the gun lobby for example is strongly related to policy/issues and not identity which is why it keeps confounding the progressive party and forcing the progressive's right-wing to pander and pretend to support gun rights, and this I think is a winning move:

microparties of 2-3 issues like I wrote, staunchly unyielding on the issues. If it were arranged correctly, it would force the progressive party to genuinely split through political deadlock over issues they "must" support in order to not lose credibility with their own base.

By doing this we could maneuver washington into a stalemate with the public and middle class, that would lead to a power vacuum, destabilizing their quid-pro-quo arrangement between the "parties", and causing the state and its unelected bureaucracy to lose long-term policy momentum

[–] • 1 pt

There is no political solution.

[–] • 0 pt

There is no political solution.

Clearly there is friend. Clearly.

p E a C f u L PROTEST only.

Peacefulprotest all day.

[–] • 1 pt

Those going to sign, agree beforehand. Those who fail or change their mind last minute get an automatic censure.

This only further submits to the idea that we're ruled by organizations and committees rather than people. It's not a step forward.

The better option is to admit that DNC are overt traitors and are only in it for themselves. GOP too, but they at least pretend to listen.

[–] • 0 pt

GOP too, but they at least pretend to listen.

This attitude is what hurts us the most.

A traitor needs to be seen for what it is: a traitor and nothing else.

The problem I see is pointing out a problem is not the same as offering a solution.

If you don't offer a solution, then people will default to what they have been normalized to accept or not push against.

Despite all talks of civil war, and even despite political solutions being 90% likely to fail, that is still a more practical and likely route to success then any other method. Weekend commandos don't like to hear this, no one does, because it sounds like massively dirty and difficult work, and oh boy is it ever.

There is a very good reason though that the marxists fight tooth and nail. And if you look, you'll see the same goal every time: political power.

because political powers is a force multiplier. It decides who the police and soldiers point their guns at. Who gets funding. Who gets legal cover. Who is allowed to push around who. Fighting an opponent, in a war of perception, for control of the middle, and all the resources and logistics that come with that, when your opponent can use the state's resources to label you as the literal devil (terrorists), is setting yourself up to lose.

I think realistically, its not that there are no political solutions. It's that there are almost none left, and even fewer viable.

And we owe it to future generations to try anyway.

Our leadership of course will be harassed, our supporters imprisoned, our members assaulted, our organizers framed, and our political backers killed indiscriminately. We will have justice denied in courts. Crimes committed against us will go unpunished and their perpetrators rewarded by federal agencies and NGOs. The news will label us all terrorists and foreign agents. The banks will foreclose on our members, and even confiscate our funds to win in court, or run campaigns. Businesses will deny us. Our properties, such as cars will be impounded, or fined. Police will run cover for rioters inflamed against us by the media.

All of this and more. And this is all good.

How? Why?

Because what it says to me is the state cannot afford the hit to its legitimacy to silence, disappear, or kill us all outright. We are not enough of a threat for the state to justify a massive crackdown to completely obliterate us without risking the public seeing the state for what it is and turning on it.

And so we must organize, build, and endure

[–] • 1 pt

The solution is complex and not easily pushed forth in a text comment.

  • Removing first past the post voting and replacing it with preferential voting,
  • Limiting voting to only citizens with a significant stake in the future (adult men, possibly only granted with military service)
  • Removing illegal immigrants and revoking birthright citizenship to remove anchor babies and their families.

There's a lot of other structure changes that could lead to better outcomes, but this is a start.

[–] • 0 pt

Removing first past the post voting and replacing it with preferential voting,

I agree because all things being equal people will, if given the mechanism, tend toward moderation. And that complicates the process of controlling elections. Maybe I'm mistaken though.

Limiting voting to only citizens with a significant stake in the future (adult men, possibly only granted with military service)

The adult men issue will be cast as misogynist, and also racist, and used as an out for GOP to vote no, in addition to the left voting no. Which, even if this had a snowballs chance, would be dead on arrival anyway. And theres no way to force it. But it does split a small percentage of the military into hardliners.

Removing illegal immigrants and revoking birthright citizenship to remove anchor babies and their families.

Doesn't solve the problem. Removing them is what most of us on the right wanted with trump, and obviously was never going to happen (thank the chamber of commerce). Birthright citizenship removal is a backdoor for the state to remove citizenship from anyone that criticizes it, so they can deny rights entirely to political opponents in the public. Anchor babies statuetes we do need, and chain migration needs to not only be stopped, but actively reversed.

Revoking the state's ability to limit tax exempt status on churchs that engage in politics, might help, or might not. The tax system has been weaponized against small businesses, speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association (go ask the waco members about their tax stamped machine guns. Oh wait, they're dead), privacy, right to engage in commerce, right to travel, right to collect rain water, property, and firearms and self defense rights.

Tax system has to be abolished as it currently exists.

[–] • 1 pt

She was likely scared for blowback from the left. THEY NEED TO BE SCARED OF THE BLOWBACK FROM US. As Alinski preached, use the enemies tactics and rules against them. We should be at her work, her husbands work, her kids school, her parents house, her siblings house, her friends houses, her church, her salon, her neighbors, her neighbors family, her neighbors work, etc....

[–] • 0 pt

her kids school, her parents house, her siblings house, her friends houses, her church, her salon, her neighbors, her neighbors family, her neighbors work,

No.

We should be at her work, her husbands work

Yes.

[–] • 1 pt

Always hassle politically active white females on the internet. Weaponize the Karen meme. We could probably assign with blacks to revoke white female suffrage.

[–] • 1 pt

This isn't just a gop thing, it happens to any bill that could conceivably benefit Whites in any way.

Load more (11 replies)