I'm personally not afraid, it just seems like everybody is spread far apart and there aren't many opportunities to advertise where you're from to give somebody a chance to be like "Oh cool we're not far apart let's meet up." Just doesn't organically come up in conversation that much.
Zipcodes.
Ignore any faggotry about "muh make-people-identify online to be sure they can be trusted."
They're asking for trust without any counter risk on themselves. I've talked to people about this before who encountered the same tactic. The goto for whoever is asking is usually "I'm posting my own details/face/etc too!"
And the response should always be
I don't know you from adam, you can just harvest information and then claim you were actually subverting/doxxing/etc.
Federal agents and their adjuncts (antifa professors, violent hate mobs, enablers in federal agencies, other terrorists), don't have to concern themselves with keeping their identity private because they don't have to concern themselves with acts of arson/rape threats/murder threats against their friends, family, and places of worship, employment, and education which the federal government is supporting/enabling against the right. But rightwingers do have to be aware of these legitimate threats against us and take security seriously. So I always demand an in person meeting.
Anyone that doesn't want to meet in person
has bad faith intentions
can't tolerate the risk of so much as a public meeting and isn't worth the time because if they aren't capable or willing to do that, then they're not gonna be willing to do anything else anyway.
is just curious, isn't actually interested in organizing and just wants to commiserate.
I have zero interest in any of those three.
That's reasonable.
That's reasonable.
It's a good rule of thumb.
Another one is 'shop talk': Anyone thats a capable individual doesn't have a need or desire to "talk shop" with others. They either know their stuff or they don't. If you have a skillset, you shut up, you use it, and you keep others in the dark, not only to protect yourself from illegal harassment, but also to protect others. If you can do something without the aid of others, least of all your 'group' or whatever, then they don't need to know anyway, unless and until they absolutely must. Thats just opsec in the age of spies, infiltrators, and a government waging a blackbag war of censorship/terrorism/suppression/replacement/propaganda against its own citizens.
Anyone that wants to "talk shop" when you meet them is
stupid
there on bad faith
isn't capable on their own
is looking for someone to motivate them
is trying to motivate you.
No one thats capable needs any of these types.
I of course am not speaking of anything illegal in any way shape or form. I'm only talking about legal actions that will nevertheless get you shut down by hostile forces. For example: attending a protest outside DC on january 6th, not entering the building in any way shape or form. Was it legal to be there? Fully. Will it still get you destroyed or even just harassed by the enemy? Yes it will.
And thats how you know you're dealing with enemies.
They don't obey their own laws, and they don't punish those in their ranks who break them.
I’ll meet up with you if you want and we can touch each other’s dicks. I’m jk that’s too gay. Send me a picture though
Dick pics to prove identity? Never thought of that. But I remember you were keen on dick pics while on Voat. Makes sense. I suppose I'm game.
(post is archived)