Truth be told, I made it a whopping 1:07 into the video the article links to. The moderator / host introduces one panelist as a "gun rights advocate" and "2nd Amendment supporter." He introduces the other panelist as a "fierce gun safety supporter." It immediately sets the tone that the 2A person is irrational and somehow not a supporter of safety. The article itself doesn't challenge that narrative, either. > There’s an experiment on the internet that’s interesting. “The Enemies Project helps ‘enemies’ discover the human being in each other.” What happened when the Second Amendment was in the spotlight? > One of the things I feel we do at Bearing Arms — besides providing news and commentary — is highlight the human elements that are sewn into the fiber of America and what that means looking through the lens of the Second Amendment. The Enemies Project does something we, I dare say, strive to do, and that’s provoke thought and perhaps conversation. “Can Empathy Stop the Bleed?” brought a “gun rights advocate” and a “gun safety advocate” together and made them talk to each other.