Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

While watching the Charlie Kirk memorial, I had a thought come to mind. I found myself wondering.. when was the last time, if there even was one, the left honored one of their own after death to the extent of Charlie Kirk? One of the more recent memorials would have been Jimmy Carter, not even close. Ruth Ginsburg, who the F is that? Melissa Hortman, State Rep from Minnesota who was murdered by a lunatic? Nope. How about Sheila Jackson Lee? 🤣🤣🤣. I think we get closer wirh Desmond Tutu, but not quite there. Then it came to me. I actually think this person may have surpassed Charlie Kirk with the outpouring of love and honor from the democrat left. His name..
George Floyd.

While watching the Charlie Kirk memorial, I had a thought come to mind. I found myself wondering.. when was the last time, if there even was one, the left honored one of their own after death to the extent of Charlie Kirk? One of the more recent memorials would have been Jimmy Carter, not even close. Ruth Ginsburg, who the F is that? Melissa Hortman, State Rep from Minnesota who was murdered by a lunatic? Nope. How about Sheila Jackson Lee? 🤣🤣🤣. I think we get closer wirh Desmond Tutu, but not quite there. Then it came to me. I actually think this person may have surpassed Charlie Kirk with the outpouring of love and honor from the democrat left. His name.. George Floyd.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 2 pts (edited )

They don't.

They use it as a excuse for violence and to take power. Like you said. Floyd.

[–] • 4 pts

This is correct. The left are nothing but NPCs: tools. Nothing more. Occasionally, I invite them to my home for entertainment. They seldom disappoint.

They do celebrate their own. Yes George Floyd is the poster child. Rather than have friends, they prefer accomplices. It's much better to be part of a crowd than have a moral stance.

I don't remember who the celebrity was, it doesn't matter. He was all for chemical castration when that was the safe position to have. Later, when it was safe to be on the other side, he came out publicly admitting he was wrong. He, of course was applauded for being so brave. Wrong! There was nothing brave about admitting he was wrong because he always took the safe bet. Being brave is taking a moral stand when it isn't safe to have that position.

Liberals can't have friends, only accomplices. Watch what happens to friendships when one of the accomplices takes the wrong position.