WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

You think I shopped it? Absolutely delusional.

Fuck off

lol

blocking someone does not equate to banning someone.

You are purposefully ignoring that shills can abuse the block function to stop people from shedding light on their kikery.

It is censorship to disallow one from commenting in your threads. That's a weakling tactic one uses when their ideas can't hold up to scrutiny.

[–] 0 pt

I think it's not proof of what you claim it is.

Because a fucking screenshot of a webpage is proof of nothing.

Like this (i.ibb.co)

am I you now? No. No I'm not. But I do have a screenshot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also you're a fucking phone.poster and only kikes and feds phone post.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Your infatuation with claiming I wasn't a voat user is only a distraction from the fact that this blocking feature is a very bad idea

How often have the deaths of free speech oriented sites started with this type of nonsense? It's just to combat shills, don't worry goy, it won't be used against you

[–] 0 pt (edited )

And free speech is effected due to people that I have blocked not being able to respond to me how?

What you are claiming is the same as saying a restraining order is the death of free speech because the person who it's ordered on can not talk to the person it's protecting.

You're arguing like a fucking kike and you have a kike tag.

e: Also these EXACT same arguments were used by the (((poster))) calling to be allowed to post (((lolicon))).

Ill concede the ss isn't proof I am JD, sure. Too bad I don't care enough to prove I was on voat to a censhorship-happy cuck.

Also you're a fucking phone.poster and only kikes and feds phone post

Now that's just fucking funny.