Read above, nigger. Shills can use this to ban people who call them out
THIS DOES NOT EQUATE TO BANNING USERS.
and they will won't be down voted by those whom they block. Recipe for disaster.
How is that a recipe for disaster? How? Because users can't self-brigade and downvote spam?
Oh no. Big deal.
downvoting matters here
No one downvotes. No one upvotes. It doesn't matter on this site, it's retarded but not for the reasons you're trying to explain.
It's a slow process, reddit didn't become eddit overnight. This the start of what will become the death of poal.
So leave. Make your own. It's not that bad to lose member if those members are keen on letting commies, niggers, faggots, trannyfaggots, spics, sandjews, jews, chinks, nips, gooks etc. have a voice.*
Free Speech is ONLY meaningful in a homogeneous community.
but muh twitter / reddit
False comparison. That's like saying a 5 year old boy who continuously steals candy from a grocery store is the same thing as a multi-billionaire kike who drains an entire community of it's wealth and resources through theft.
It's wrong. It's retarded. It's jewish.
Cut it out.
Scope matters, and you are oh so conveniently ignoring scope. This is a TINY AS FUCK website with a few hundred active users. That's it. Twitter and kikebook are sites with hundreds of millions of users and dozens of millions of active users. They are LITERALLY the modern day town square. They ARE legally under the limits of the 1st, but the ZOGSA will never hold that to reality.
*I am very fully aware of who runs this site. The point holds exclusive of the method used to explain the point.
Free Speech is ONLY meaningful in a homogeneous community
No, freedom of speech is absolute.
So you've said it, you don't want poal to have free speech. Nothing more to say then.
So you've said it, you don't want poal to have free speech.
Not what I stated at all.
Quit lying Moshe.
e: I want poal to be homogeneous of like minded individuals who understand White supremacy isn't an opinion, who are okay with Whites having their own country and own land and own government and own rights etc.
Those are not the same thing and you know it. But you went with the precise opposite of my intent to make me look bad because you couldn't actually argue anything.
ee:
freedom of speech is absolute.
Also that doesn't go against or negate anything I said. That deals with what free speech is, not the contexts it's used in.
You can't police speech and call it free speech. Disallowing one from commenting in any thread is censorship.
Now that you've given some context for 'homogenous' I can better respond.
e: I want poal to be homogeneous of like minded individuals who understand White supremacy isn't an opinion, who are okay with Whites having their own country and own land and own government and own rights etc.
See you are asking for a nice little safe space/echo chamber, even if with good intent. The internet pre-obama phones must have been nice. No niggers could afford a computer and all.
Forcing homogenization is a poor route. With free discussion being allowed this site will likely (and already is, mostly) become close to homogeneous in the way you describe it. Good ideas will prevail.
Not allowing differing and dissenting views (no matter how retarded or kiked they may be) only shows that you are afraid of engaging others in the arena of free discussion and discourse, and you are losing the opportunity to shoot said ideas down with truth and reason, which would further expose zog/communist ideologies for what they are.
Freedom of speech is absolute, and is absolute in practice as well; else it does not qualify as free speech. You cannot twist and pervert it by altering the "context in which it's used". That's not free expression.
This block user bs will give shills a vector for control. It will enable them to push threads that have zero dissenting views without recourse. Have fun with that.
(post is archived)