So you've said it, you don't want poal to have free speech.
Not what I stated at all.
Quit lying Moshe.
e: I want poal to be homogeneous of like minded individuals who understand White supremacy isn't an opinion, who are okay with Whites having their own country and own land and own government and own rights etc.
Those are not the same thing and you know it. But you went with the precise opposite of my intent to make me look bad because you couldn't actually argue anything.
ee:
freedom of speech is absolute.
Also that doesn't go against or negate anything I said. That deals with what free speech is, not the contexts it's used in.
You can't police speech and call it free speech. Disallowing one from commenting in any thread is censorship.
Now that you've given some context for 'homogenous' I can better respond.
e: I want poal to be homogeneous of like minded individuals who understand White supremacy isn't an opinion, who are okay with Whites having their own country and own land and own government and own rights etc.
See you are asking for a nice little safe space/echo chamber, even if with good intent. The internet pre-obama phones must have been nice. No niggers could afford a computer and all.
Forcing homogenization is a poor route. With free discussion being allowed this site will likely (and already is, mostly) become close to homogeneous in the way you describe it. Good ideas will prevail.
Not allowing differing and dissenting views (no matter how retarded or kiked they may be) only shows that you are afraid of engaging others in the arena of free discussion and discourse, and you are losing the opportunity to shoot said ideas down with truth and reason, which would further expose zog/communist ideologies for what they are.
Freedom of speech is absolute, and is absolute in practice as well; else it does not qualify as free speech. You cannot twist and pervert it by altering the "context in which it's used". That's not free expression.
This block user bs will give shills a vector for control. It will enable them to push threads that have zero dissenting views without recourse. Have fun with that.
You can't police speech and call it free speech. Disallowing one from commenting in any thread is censorship.
you must disallow private phone calls and communications between private citizens because that's censorship!!!
Holy fuck.
Forcing homogenization is a poor route.
I don't give a fuck. You want something different than free speech. I want free speech but I want to control who I associate with. Freedom of association is more important.
With free discussion being allowed this site will likely (and already is, mostly) become close to homogeneous in the way you describe it.
True. Except false. It will be false-flagged well before then. jews won't let another full/pol/ happen.
Not allowing differing and dissenting views (no matter how retarded or kiked they may be) only shows that you are afraid of engaging others in the arena of free discussion and discourse
Nope. Doesn't do that at all. Im tired of it all. I have no interest in promoting a platform for commies, niggers, kikes to proselytize from. None. Just like if I were to make my own private group among my friends and allow free speech it WOULD NOT BE CENSORSHIP if I were to disallow someone from joining the group. Just as it's not censorship here.
You need to really get over this idea that you're owed anything. That you're owed an account here. That you're owed the ability to post here. This is a private website, you need an account to post etc.
I'm done with this conversation. You are the reason why free speech is a garbage as fuck ideal to have when there are enemies within that will destroy you with it. You love the ideal, but you are either too dishonest to admit the cost, are not intelligent enough to realize the cost, or fully know the cost and are a shill.
There are no other options.
you must disallow private phone calls and communications between private citizens because that's censorship!!!
That's completely different, we are talking about an open fucking forum here. Is there a expectation of privacy in a poal thread?
You want something different than free speech
I don't know where you got that idea.
Im tired of it all.
I get it, but we need to fight the hordes no matter how tiring it may be. We have to do something other than give shills literal functions to use against us.
I have no interest in promoting a platform for commies, niggers, kikes to proselytize from. None.
Does that really mean letting users have the ability to block others is a good idea? That's the easy way out, and a weak way of thinking. Better to let them try and fail under the public eye.
Just like if I were to make my own private group among my friends and allow free speech it WOULD NOT BE CENSORSHIP if I were to disallow someone from joining the group.
Sure, that's true.
Just as it's not censorship here.
The problem is that would be disallowing commenting on a public forum. Any infringement on public discussion is censorship, no?
Or are you saying poal threads are private discussion? Because I can't agree with that assessment.
You need to really get over this idea that you're owed anything. That you're owed an account here. That you're owed the ability to post here. This is a private website, you need an account to post etc.
There is some truth to this, I suppose.
I'm done with this conversation.
That's fine.
You are the reason why free speech is a garbage as fuck ideal to have when there are enemies within that will destroy you with it.
Enemies cannot destroy anything with free speech! Their tactics fail time and time again when they aren't protected by censorship.
You love the ideal, but you are either too dishonest to admit the cost, are not intelligent enough to realize the cost, or fully know the cost and are a shill.
the cost of free speech
What cost? Shill/communist/jew tactics won't work if one can simply point them out and combat them through honest discourse. Truth will prevail, we don't need to block or ban anyone other than those who truly abuse the system outside of using words.
Perhaps I'm ignorant of what censorship is, and I will concede that blocking a user/not letting them comment in your threads is not necessarily censorship in it's purest, constitutional form. It is however the first step of many that will eventually lead to not being able to call out jewry or say nigger due to impoliteness or some other such nonsense. I've seen it before, and don't wish to see it happen again here.
I've said all I wish to say, and you've made some compelling arguments, but I still have to disagree that blocking users is a good idea.
(post is archived)