And free speech is effected due to people that I have blocked not being able to respond to me how?
Read above, nigger. Shills can use this to ban people who call them out, and they will won't be down voted by those whom they block. Recipe for disaster.
It's a slow process, reddit didn't become eddit overnight. This the start of what will become the death of poal.
You're arguing like a fucking kike and you have a kike tag
Irrelevant deflection.
Read above, nigger. Shills can use this to ban people who call them out
THIS DOES NOT EQUATE TO BANNING USERS.
and they will won't be down voted by those whom they block. Recipe for disaster.
How is that a recipe for disaster? How? Because users can't self-brigade and downvote spam?
Oh no. Big deal.
downvoting matters here
No one downvotes. No one upvotes. It doesn't matter on this site, it's retarded but not for the reasons you're trying to explain.
It's a slow process, reddit didn't become eddit overnight. This the start of what will become the death of poal.
So leave. Make your own. It's not that bad to lose member if those members are keen on letting commies, niggers, faggots, trannyfaggots, spics, sandjews, jews, chinks, nips, gooks etc. have a voice.*
Free Speech is ONLY meaningful in a homogeneous community.
but muh twitter / reddit
False comparison. That's like saying a 5 year old boy who continuously steals candy from a grocery store is the same thing as a multi-billionaire kike who drains an entire community of it's wealth and resources through theft.
It's wrong. It's retarded. It's jewish.
Cut it out.
Scope matters, and you are oh so conveniently ignoring scope. This is a TINY AS FUCK website with a few hundred active users. That's it. Twitter and kikebook are sites with hundreds of millions of users and dozens of millions of active users. They are LITERALLY the modern day town square. They ARE legally under the limits of the 1st, but the ZOGSA will never hold that to reality.
*I am very fully aware of who runs this site. The point holds exclusive of the method used to explain the point.
Free Speech is ONLY meaningful in a homogeneous community
No, freedom of speech is absolute.
So you've said it, you don't want poal to have free speech. Nothing more to say then.
So you've said it, you don't want poal to have free speech.
Not what I stated at all.
Quit lying Moshe.
e: I want poal to be homogeneous of like minded individuals who understand White supremacy isn't an opinion, who are okay with Whites having their own country and own land and own government and own rights etc.
Those are not the same thing and you know it. But you went with the precise opposite of my intent to make me look bad because you couldn't actually argue anything.
ee:
freedom of speech is absolute.
Also that doesn't go against or negate anything I said. That deals with what free speech is, not the contexts it's used in.
(post is archived)