WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

While foldable phones are masterful engineering, I rathe consider it an overhyped gimmick, as foldable mobile phones are less robust and not water-resistant by design, the same argument people use against user-replaceable batteries (debunked: Benefits of user-replaceable batteries § Water irresistance myth (en.everybodywiki.com)).

How come the Air View and Air Gestures features on the 2013 Galaxy S4 were considered blatant gimmicks (but actually useful if wider implemented), but a design compromising water resistance and robustness is so hyped?

Smells like hypocrisy.

While foldable phones are masterful engineering, I rathe consider it an overhyped gimmick, as foldable mobile phones are less robust and not water-resistant by design, the same argument people use against user-replaceable batteries (debunked: [Benefits of user-replaceable batteries § Water irresistance myth](https://en.everybodywiki.com/Benefits_of_user-replaceable_batteries#Water_irresistance_myth)). How come the Air View and Air Gestures features on the 2013 Galaxy S4 were considered blatant gimmicks (but actually useful if wider implemented), but a design compromising water resistance and robustness is so hyped? Smells like hypocrisy.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

They've run out of ideas. They're trying to "reboot" the flip phone just like they do with old movies/tv shows.

[–] 2 pts

I agree the tech is cool, but not something I would want.

It's still good people are willing to pay for crap like this so it encourages more R&D.