WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

695
  1. Do you think everyone should have the right to say anything? If not, what are the restrictions?

  2. Do you think the owner of a speech platform should be able to censor a user's speech?

Trying to puzzle through this issue. I'm not asking what's currently legal or constitutional - more just how do you think things should be?

1. Do you think everyone should have the right to say anything? If not, what are the restrictions? 2. Do you think the owner of a speech platform should be able to censor a user's speech? Trying to puzzle through this issue. I'm not asking what's currently legal or constitutional - more just how do you think things should be?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

DEBATE REQUIRES freedom of speech. THere is NO actionable or bannable SPEECH. You hear/see a threat? YOU can investigate further (for ACTIONS to fullfill a threat). But a THREAT is NOT criticism or "offensive" language or DISLIKE of some individual OR group OR everyone. I don't know of ANY but the MOST stupid deranged people who would openly threaten a person (emotion). and ON the internet, the SAFETY is OBVIOUS if you are ANONYMOUS and even if you're not. Some people express themselves more emotionally (eg niggers). Except niggers don't hang out on line (in general) they LOOT and act like monkies in PUBLIC. OKAY to SHOOT them in the HEAD.