WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

987
  1. Do you think everyone should have the right to say anything? If not, what are the restrictions?

  2. Do you think the owner of a speech platform should be able to censor a user's speech?

Trying to puzzle through this issue. I'm not asking what's currently legal or constitutional - more just how do you think things should be?

1. Do you think everyone should have the right to say anything? If not, what are the restrictions? 2. Do you think the owner of a speech platform should be able to censor a user's speech? Trying to puzzle through this issue. I'm not asking what's currently legal or constitutional - more just how do you think things should be?

(post is archived)

Certainly "free speech" is a concept invented by man, which has been twisted to all sorts of evil ends. But the converse, i.e. suppression of speech, is rarely done for a good and decent reason. In other words, we tolerate subversive and evil speech so we don't have to tolerate an oppressive and evil government. I guess that might not be working out so well right now.

[–] 0 pt

I think suppressing the lies of the jews is a very good and decent reason to suppress speech. If we have an oppressive and evil government freedom of speech doesn't really matter. Look how well it's working out for us now? The constitutions says freedom of speech, but that's obviously not the case when people can get fired from their jobs or get blackballed by companies etc. The government won't defend our right to say anything because private businesses don't have to enforce this right. Plus, the government can twist the rules and say there are limits to free speech which they have. This all goes back to a Godless government. When you separate Church and state you end up with a government that believes they are God and they decide what is right and wrong.