![[sourced] Child Molestation by Race - Per Capita [472x413 - 77KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/u5IYmp.png){kind=link}
Really like these nonsense charts with unusable variables. The only thing we are seeing is just some bars where they are different sizes but the y axis is nonsense. It looks like "representation relative to population" is actually the percentage underneath each categories on the x-axis.
But what I did learn is that Hispanics molest the shit out of each other. That's legit crazy and something new. I thought the blacks did it the worst because of the shit black people tell me that goes down in their families. Everyone is molesting everyone in black homes.
The numbers under the x-axis labels show the same thing (inverse) as the values on the y-axis. If whites are 70% of the population and commit 70% of the offenses, then their y-value would be 100 and it would say (0%) below the x-label for equal representation relative to population. (-22%) for whites is the same as 78%, which is what it shows on the y-axis.
I’m not sure how that’s nonsense or how that means the chart is mislabeled
Everyone is molesting everyone in black homes
Not that women never do it, but for sure if more black homes had adult men present their numbers would be way higher
I’m not sure how that’s nonsense
Because we have per capita stats that would have worked just fine for all of this and not ended up looking like nonsense. If one of my employees brought me this nonsense at work, I'd ask them if they are in the right profession (I do stats and research).
The person who made this is a moron. When they teach you stats, proper labeling on your charts is the basics. The absolute basics. Messing up the labels like was done and not having the labels defined properly clearly demonstrates how much of an absolute moron the author of this chart really is.
The author was trying to go for an under and over representation stat. But failed miserably (you can do a per capita stat and IN THE READING, state which group is over/under represented). Also, you're defending this too hard. You must be the retard who made this. Damn, you're retarded if you made this.
Lmao what?
You didn’t understand what the y-axis label meant.
That doesn’t make the person who made the chart retarded, it makes you retarded. Pretty much everyone here understood this graph except you, you should not be in charge of people whose job it is to present information if you think this simple chart is nonsense.
It literally shows per capita data using 100% as the baseline for expectation per race but you somehow think it’s something separate from per capita rates
(post is archived)