I think the only derangement shown here is from you. Ignoring any evidence provided, only thing you seem to believe is the word of Gaetz. You also have confused the Daily Beast with the prosecution. Again, if Gaetz was a democrat don't think he'd be getting a pass.
You haven't provided any evidence of anything. Neither has the Daily Beast. No sources, no documents, no photos, no direct statements, nothing. What "evidence" do you feel you've posted that has shown Gaetz fucked a child? Posting an unverified claim isn't proof of anything. Allegations, assertions, and inuendoes aren't evidence of anything.
You haven't posted a single thing Gaetz said, and you've even suggested that his refusal to say something is evidence of guilt. You've also suggested that his method of refuting these allegations was proof that he's guilty. I never suggested that I believed Gaetz. I've simply asked for you to prove your claim, or show where the Daily Beast has proven theirs. I'm still waiting.
The Daily Beast, like any journalist outlet, has an obligation to prove their claims. That obligation has nothing to do with a prosecution. But thanks for acknowledging that they haven't met that obligation. Posting claims with no evidence is tabloid, and the Daily Beast is acting on conspiracy theory.
Bill Clinton got a pass. So has Joe Biden. Hunter Biden, also. The link of democrat rapists and child molesters is long and the massive majority unpunished, and still in office. And for Clinton and Hunter, there is an avalanche of evidence that they have sexually abused several women. Clinton has raped people. Total pass.
And finally, Kathy Griffin didn't investigate this matter and get that screenshot herself, right? From where did it come? When was that conversation? Where is the rest of it? Where is the proof that it is real? That it's actually Greenberg and Stone having that conversation? I didn't say it's fake, but is asking for a way to verify it unreasonable?
You also suggested that Kathy Griffin posting a screenshot was another source besides the Daily Beast. You're trying to imply that multiple sources add credibility to the story, but she's simply reposting something she read, probably from the Daily Beast, where she has connections. But like we've seen with Trump and the "find the fraud" bullshit, even if dozens of outlets, far more reputable than the Daily Beast, post something, if they all get that information from the same, lying assed fake news outlet, the Washington Post, it doesn't make it true.
So, you're saying Greenberg had sex with a 17 year old, pretended Gaetz did too and framed Gaetz for some reason to get a pardon and somehow faked payments from gaetz which he forwarded onto underage hookers.
The allegations against the teachers were what led the feds to Greenberg. When authorities arrested Greenberg and sifted through his electronic records and devices they discovered a medley of other alleged wrongdoing, leading them to open an investigation of possible sex trafficking involving a far more high-profile Florida Republican. So, the electronic information that cleared the teacher, implemented Gaetz.
I didn't say anything.
The article shows that Greenberg just pled guilty to falsely accusing someone of having sex with a minor.
Now, what woman or women have accused Gaetz of paying them for sex when they were underaged?
(post is archived)