Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

877

So for example, do not say "Hitler" say "Adolf".

Replace "Trump", with "Donald" or "Donald J."

Etc. This idea can be extended, with slight modification, to organizations.

Instead of "the GOP" say "The RNC"

Instead of "liberals/leftwing/democrats" call them the "DNC".

Instead of "intelligence agencies" or other federal agencies, call them "federal departments".

Instead of "the IRS", call them the "IRS federal profit department."

Instead of "The federal reserve bank." call them the "american centralized banking system" or "central bank of america" Or simply call it "the private federal reserve bank" every time you talk about it.

The word change doesn't seem like much, but its huge to the public because names used for long periods become placeholders for ideas, that we accept on mental reflex, unless we actively analyze them, which most of the public doesn't.

Always change the names that the opposition uses to define itself to fuck up their propaganda and its impact on the public.

Generally:

  1. take whatever abstraction exists, and remove it. Make the opponent concrete. "Liberal/Conservative" aren't types of politician. They're political ideologies. The abstractness and the misue of this abstraction for something concrete thats also entirely different, is where people end up fooled. So call them by their actual party organization labels.

  2. undistort the labels and spin. The federal reserve is not federal. By changing its title we restore the truth out of the sophistry thats used to paper over one of the most destructive organizations in american history.

So for example, do not say "Hitler" say "Adolf". Replace "Trump", with "Donald" or "Donald J." Etc. This idea can be extended, with slight modification, to organizations. Instead of "the GOP" say "The RNC" Instead of "liberals/leftwing/democrats" call them the "DNC". Instead of "intelligence agencies" or other federal agencies, call them "federal departments". Instead of "the IRS", call them the "IRS federal profit department." Instead of "The federal reserve bank." call them the "american centralized banking system" or "central bank of america" Or simply call it "the private federal reserve bank" every time you talk about it. The word change doesn't seem like much, but its huge to the public because names used for long periods become placeholders for ideas, that we accept on mental reflex, unless we actively analyze them, which most of the public doesn't. Always change the names that the opposition uses to define itself to fuck up their propaganda and its impact on the public. Generally: 1. take whatever abstraction exists, and remove it. Make the opponent concrete. "Liberal/Conservative" aren't types of politician. They're political ideologies. The abstractness and the misue of this abstraction for something concrete thats also entirely different, is where people end up fooled. So call them by their actual party organization labels. 2. undistort the labels and spin. The federal reserve is not federal. By changing its title we restore the truth out of the sophistry thats used to paper over one of the most destructive organizations in american history.

(post is archived)

[–] • 11 pts

"Always change the names that the opposition uses to define itself to fuck up their propaganda and its impact on the public."

Good advice.
Pro-aggressives not progressive.

[–] • 4 pts

Pro-aggressives not progressive.

Thats a start.

Another good one is regressives.

[–] • 2 pts

Congressives

[–] • 9 pts

Someone understands framing, persuasion and psychology.

Nice! Excellent list.

[–] • 2 pts

Changing words and meanings is one of the filthy jews greatest tricks, so what you are saying is to use the enemies tactics?

[–] • 6 pts

so what you are saying is to use the enemies tactics?

On the contrary, I'm arguing the opposite. I'm arguing to change words and phrases back to their original meanings. I'm arguing against sophistry.

Arguing against sophistry is not the same as supporting sophistry.

Nice try though.

[–] • 3 pts

I would love to relearn what the jews have hidden. For instance they changed the term Aryan into "Proto Indo European" and have destroyed so much good information and true history.

[–] • 2 pts

Tataria must have been glorious.

[–] • 1 pt

Definitely I like to watch videos from Asha Logos where he talks about how the Ancients described what it was like way back when. The Land of milk and honey and it's Aryan inhabitants are amazing to envision. They were extremely intelligent and nothing to trifle with though.

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt

Op gets a little piece of the shit-puzzle.

Always change the names that the opposition uses to define itself to fuck up their propaganda and its impact on the public.

So your telling me these terrorists are just undocumented combatants fighting as revolutionaries against government? 4 definitions of terrorist right there. In the end Ops right though, they will hear something different than the hypnotic drone of modern media and their neurons will start firing. As dumb as the public is we do need them to collectively think for everything they've got.

[+] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt

ADOLF FUCKIN' HITLER

[–] • 0 pt

Instead of "Hitler" a simple "Mein Fuhrer"

[–] • 0 pt

You'll find rapid creole formation occurring on imageboards often these days. It's actually really interesting to witness. "Let's go, Brandon!" is a perfect example of this. Indeed, your line about always using fluid verbiage is a perfect way to combat censorship and their linguistic maneuvers. Diluting the meaning of words, eg 'racist', 'pandemic', 'journalism', 'money', is one of their favorite plays and they run it almost every down. Maybe you noticed, maybe you didn't, but I actually say "Don" often for this reason. It evokes a different emotion. Have you studied Neural Linguistic Programming? Circumventing anchors is actually what you're describing.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Only passingly familiar with NLP, mainly lab profile system. Good for understanding what motivates people and for when people are attempting to influence you.

Circumventing anchors

I'm not familiar but I'd like to read more.

[–] • 0 pt

To anchor something is to synthesize emotions due to its invocation. The red hexagons at the side of the road could all be blank tomorrow and never say "stop" on them again, but anyone that's been driving for a year will probably still do it anyway forever. The same learning system can be exploited in a variety of ways, from influencing purchase options on the consumer end to eliciting votes in any given election. Of course, I'm making things very simple here. This can get way more complicated. For the most part, the more you layer the anchor, the more potent it is and, likely, the longer it lasts. Anchoring is a basic concept of NLP. There's much more to it, but this is a quick and obvious example that's usually easy to explain and showcase.

[–] • 0 pt

but this is a quick and obvious example that's usually easy to explain and showcase.

"usually"?