Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

I think not

I think not

(post is archived)

[–] • 21 pts

the better question is, is it your government if they impose restrictions on you but not those who break the law. its been going on for at least a decade in your face level.

[–] • 8 pts

Welcome to Anarcho-Tyranny. Full blown globohomo.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

It's an occupier. A state that was built up within your nation-state and then consolidated power through insidious means.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

This.

Hostile occupying force. Do as you must.

[–] • 1 pt

Better question yet is what are you going to do about it? Is this the best you can do?

[–] • 4 pts

Nothing that would be announced to a fed nigger like yourself

[–] • 10 pts

The social contract is long broken.

[–] [deleted] • 6 pts

There is no suchthing as a social contract unless you get to freely sign up and to freely end the agreement and walk away. Social Contract is jew-talk.

[–] • 1 pt

How is there no such thing as a contract unless you can end the contract whenever you feel like? That's the opposite of a contract. The fact that the government and the ruling class have broken the contract means that there should be cause for consequences, like when you break a contract. We don't hypothetically walk away simply because contracts are meaningless, but because the other side has broken it.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

A good contract will include term and conditions and always include an exit clause. Consider auto insurance. Terms include that you can quit any time, plus that if you stop making payments, they can also end the contract.

And this: when did you become party to the Social Contract? They never sent me a form to sign. Nobody is a party to a contract automatically at birth. That's slavery.

[–] • 0 pt

it never never existed. look up shays rebellion.

[–] • 5 pts

Kikes like to pretend Christianity is pro tyranny but Romans 13 clearly defines the traits of a just ruler, one who deserves alleigance. When a "ruler" or ruling body ceases to uphold good and fails to be a terror unto evildoers and instead practices the inverse, it is not a ruler that any man has any moral obligation to comply with or obey.

Does the government enforce or abide by a strict, plain reading of the Constitution? The answer is clearly "no", and so the actions of this government carry no lawful or moral weight.

"Become ungovernable" doesn't mean to become an anarchist. It means that it is past time to deny compliance to the false rulers that claim a usurped authority over us.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Romans 13 (biblegateway.com)

[–] • 2 pts

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans+13&version=KJV

4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

If the government isn't doing this, it is null.

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Do we owe allegiance to a government?

No.

[–] • 3 pts

I disagree I believe I owe alliegence to a government that is of for and by the people

This ain't it tho

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Perhaps you haven't thought this all the way through. Of, for and by which people? Do I get to decide who makes the rules for my family, or does some majority-rule mob call all the shots? Ick.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I don't think any government, other than self government, actually is.

[–] • 0 pt

The problem with nations is that they inherently combine disparate peoples in collective effort.
The other problem is that we need nations to survive now. Pandora's box was opened ages ago, and he who has the most toys wins, at least on Earth.

[–] • 1 pt

You’ve got it backwards. The government that is for and by the people is a government that owes allegiance to the people, not the other way around.

[–] • 0 pt

I didn't sign the declaration of independence nor the constitution, why should I agree to something I had no say in, something I didn't have a say in when the terms were forming, and also a contract I didn't sign? I owe allegiance only to God

[+] [deleted] • 3 pts
[–] • 3 pts (edited )

No taxation without representation.

[–] • 2 pts

Fuck No. It is no longer a government protecting the citizens from enemies foreign and domestic, it is bringing her enemies to her shores. We need to not comply,

[–] • 2 pts

Gov is loyal to world gov not America.

[–] • 1 pt

Better question, if your government works against you and not with you, why do you allow it to continue to believe it can govern you?

[–] • 1 pt

Being loyal to a nation is not the same as being loyal to a government. As a government deviates from the nation to which you are loyal, then you should have no guilt over discarding your loyalty to the government. We have a government that has spent decades pushing against the nation to which most of us would be loyal. Embracing a government that does evil and rejects the principles and the people that make up a nation is treason. Our nation is occupied by a hostile power.

Load more (16 replies)