Trump or Scavino had to send tweets from their accounts at the time of the timestamps. If they sent tweets out that didn't broadcast, that raises a flag. If tweets were sent out without them sending them, that raises a flag. Trump and Scavino were in on coordinating the timestamp deltas with Q. (((Twitter))) had no idea of the deltas until hours later when someone published a Qproof about it. Trump broadcast a few Qposts himself, signed Q+. Try again.
Trump or Scavino had to send tweets from their accounts at the time of the timestamps. If they sent tweets out that didn't broadcast, that raises a flag. If tweets were sent out without them sending them, that raises a flag. Trump and Scavino were in on coordinating the timestamp deltas with Q. (((Twitter))) had no idea of the deltas until hours later when someone published a Qproof about it. Trump broadcast a few Qposts himself, signed Q+. Try again.
That's a very naïve understanding of how software systems work. And how do you that Scavino was involved? Try again.
Scavino tweets were involved in many Qproofs. Where have you been?
All of your points revolve around the idea that these proofs were 100% authentic. Think bigger. As Q said, you have more than you know.
BTW, I was a CS/EE. I know how software works.
BTW, I was a CS/EE. I know how software works.
Then you should be able to come up with quite a few ways that these delta proofs could be created by parties not involved with Trump and still appear to be linked together. Did Trump ever acknowledge a Q proof as intentional on his part? Would he go along with it if he wasn't involved but it helped his fan base to believe in him?
Fellow EE/CS here, btw.
(post is archived)