Trump or Scavino had to send tweets from their accounts at the time of the timestamps. If they sent tweets out that didn't broadcast, that raises a flag. If tweets were sent out without them sending them, that raises a flag. Trump and Scavino were in on coordinating the timestamp deltas with Q. (((Twitter))) had no idea of the deltas until hours later when someone published a Qproof about it. Trump broadcast a few Qposts himself, signed Q+. Try again.
That's a very naïve understanding of how software systems work. And how do you that Scavino was involved? Try again.
Scavino tweets were involved in many Qproofs. Where have you been?
All of your points revolve around the idea that these proofs were 100% authentic. Think bigger. As Q said, you have more than you know.
I have to call it a night. 12:30AM here. It's been fun.
BTW, I was a CS/EE. I know how software works.
BTW, I was a CS/EE. I know how software works.
Then you should be able to come up with quite a few ways that these delta proofs could be created by parties not involved with Trump and still appear to be linked together. Did Trump ever acknowledge a Q proof as intentional on his part? Would he go along with it if he wasn't involved but it helped his fan base to believe in him?
Fellow EE/CS here, btw.
Then you should be able to come up with quite a few ways that these delta proofs could be created by parties not involved with Trump
Trump's Twitter and Q's 8chn/8kun were watched and anyhing posted was captured immediately by other aggregators. Sure some software could fake a tweet or somehow fake Q's trip code in a fake Qdrop but they would be noticed immediately by Trump, Q and anons after the fact, taken down and investigated because they were not legitimate - neither Trump nor Q sent them. The software protections in place on Twitter and 8chn/8kun were apparently sufficient to prevent this, otherwise hackers would have flooded these accounts with nonsense to disrupt Trump and Q communications. I think it would be impossible to get away with faking Trump tweets or Q posts. Then there was the highest level of scrutiny applied to create the zero-delta Q proofs, checked and rechecked by anons before publication. These controls prevented any extraneous bullshit from ever getting through.
Did Trump ever acknowledge a Q proof as intentional on his part?
No. Why would he? MSM was relentlessly gaslighting and bashing "Qanon".
Would he go along with it if he wasn't involved but it helped his fan base to believe in him?
I'd estimate maybe 0.1% of Trump's supporters followed Q. The purpose of Q was to expose truth, awaken, organize, arm and weaponize autists/anons with fifth generation informational warfare skillsets to be used to push back against the (((DS))) intelligence/media apparatus; growing fan base had nothing to do with it. Trump would not go along with a larp unless he had control of it. Q could operate in the shadows at arms length from Trump. Media was too fearful to ask Trump about Q directly.
Fellow EE/CS here, btw.
CS/EE was an exciting career for me (I quit in 2004). I was in the engineering/development side of the semiconductor biz. Lots of challenge, exciting times and met a lot of good people - if I forget about the endless grind. How are you liking it?
(post is archived)