Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

612
• (edited ) (+10/-0)
Pineal Gland Discussion

Tl;Dr This is a discussion thread. If you don't want to read a lot it's probably not for you, but thank you for stopping by.

Pineal Gland General

Have you not heard of the pineal Gland? Do you not even Joe Rogan (dailystormer.name)?

The argument goes that the Pineal Gland is the part of the body that interfaces with the psychic or spiritual planes -- essentially the third eye or Ajna chakra in modern terms. However, most of our Pineal Glands are unnecessarily calcified, due to flouride exposure in our youth. If we could only decalcify that Pineal, we would be able to be more psychic and more spiritually connected. Some people recommend taking iodine to do just that or to counteract iodine deficiency related to fluoride intake. (pic8.co)

Skeptics assert the above is pseudoscientific, new age bullshit. And they apparently can get quite huffy about if on Q&A sites like Quora. 1 (quora.com) 2 (quora.com)

I can summarize their argument as the following: Flouride doesn't calcify. There is no evidence the Pineal Gland is supposed to perform any spiritual interfacing function, nor is there any evidence that flouride calcifies it and stops this function.

The skeptics arguments strike me as somewhat suspicious because of their tone (adopting a high academic lexicon to appear more intelligent and attempting to shame rather than simply correct the perceived inaccuracies , which I've often seen paired with other dubious viewpoints such as racial universalism, Holocaust trutherism, brexit remain camp, gender wage gap, etc.) and also because their dismissal of flouride as a calcifying agent seems like an overreach and possibly a unicorn truth that ignores the complex interaction of chemicals in the human body.

To wit, my dentist says we flouridate water because dietary flouride causes better calcification of the teeth (only in young people whose bodies are still developing; doesn't do anything for adults really). Whether flouride calcifies the teeth directly or through interactions with other calcifying agents shouldn't matter. The introduction of it to the developing human body eventually leads to calcification of the teeth, according to my dentist. I did not ask the dentist about the Pineal Gland because I assume they would have no opinion to offer.

Yet the skeptics of Pineal Gland calcification do raise an important question: If Pineal Gland calcification is a reality, what is the evidence for it?

Further: What is the evidence for the Pineal Gland's spiritual component or interactions? Is decalcification even possible and if so, through what means?

I'm going to be casually looking into this a little more tonight. Will post answers I find in comments. In the meantime it'd be cool if anyone who knows a little about it would weigh in.

Tl;Dr This is a discussion thread. If you don't want to read a lot it's probably not for you, but thank you for stopping by. #Pineal Gland General Have you not heard of the pineal Gland? Do you not even [Joe Rogan](https://dailystormer.name/joe-rogan-calls-in-sneaky-orthodox-jew-gives-him-two-hour-lecture-on-psychedelic-drugs/)? The argument goes that the Pineal Gland is the part of the body that interfaces with the psychic or spiritual planes -- essentially the third eye or Ajna chakra in modern terms. However, most of our Pineal Glands are unnecessarily calcified, due to flouride exposure in our youth. If we could only decalcify that Pineal, we would be able to be more psychic and more spiritually connected. Some people recommend taking iodine to do just that [or to counteract iodine deficiency related to fluoride intake.](https://pic8.co/sh/zfhhDk.png) Skeptics assert the above is pseudoscientific, new age bullshit. And they apparently can get quite huffy about if on Q&A sites like Quora. [1](https://www.quora.com/Is-it-actually-possible-to-decalcify-the-pineal-gland/answer/Mark-Abrahams-PhD-LMHC) [2](https://www.quora.com/Does-liquid-iodine-really-help-to-decalcify-the-pineal-gland-after-years-of-drinking-water-with-fluoride-in-it/answer/Gerry-Uswak) I can summarize their argument as the following: Flouride doesn't calcify. There is no evidence the Pineal Gland is supposed to perform any spiritual interfacing function, nor is there any evidence that flouride calcifies it and stops this function. The skeptics arguments strike me as somewhat suspicious because of their tone (adopting a high academic lexicon to appear more intelligent and attempting to shame rather than simply correct the perceived inaccuracies , which I've often seen paired with other dubious viewpoints such as racial universalism, Holocaust trutherism, brexit remain camp, gender wage gap, etc.) and also because their dismissal of flouride as a calcifying agent seems like an overreach and possibly a unicorn truth that ignores the complex interaction of chemicals in the human body. To wit, my dentist says we flouridate water because dietary flouride causes better calcification of the teeth (only in young people whose bodies are still developing; doesn't do anything for adults really). Whether flouride calcifies the teeth directly or through interactions with other calcifying agents shouldn't matter. The introduction of it to the developing human body eventually leads to calcification of the teeth, according to my dentist. I did not ask the dentist about the Pineal Gland because I assume they would have no opinion to offer. Yet the skeptics of Pineal Gland calcification do raise an important question: If Pineal Gland calcification is a reality, what is the evidence for it? Further: What is the evidence for the Pineal Gland's spiritual component or interactions? Is decalcification even possible and if so, through what means? I'm going to be casually looking into this a little more tonight. Will post answers I find in comments. In the meantime it'd be cool if anyone who knows a little about it would weigh in.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (25).
[–] • 1 pt

Calcification:

Pardon any errors in summarizing I'm going through these somewhat quickly.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27319034
Abstract indicates calcification of pineal gland can be observed by Xray. Also seems to imply calcification may be part of the aging process.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6017004/ Abstract: Pineal gland has highest calcification rate of any organ in the body. Calcification may be linked to neurological disorders. Article goes on to mention flouride as a possible biohazard contributing to calcification. Rate of calcification may be slowed by reducing flouride intake and, oddly enough, increasing phytate (avoiding this is one of the main reasons people do the Paleo diet afaik). It hypothesizes some medical interventions might be able to decalcify the pineal, but does not make any mention of iodine.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744187 Abstract suggests link between flouride concentrations in water and calcification rate of a certain duck.

[–] • 1 pt

The concept of calcification will not be founded in virtually any type of academic quality. If it is, it's indeed found, it probably won't be all that honest.

There's good reason for this: calcifying your Pineal Gland grants you extensive spiritual insight. Beyond that, you will start to feel a bit different: more vivid dreaming, better memory and an clearer processing ability. You will feel more in tune with other people too, often causing you to "feel" a gaze, it will be easier "read peoples' thoughts, etc.

Just so you're aware, I'm new to this area for the most part and I myself asked frequently in the beginning what all would change.

[–] • 1 pt

I guess the main question would be how do you know? Did you just take someone's word for it that you need to do x and y to decalcify the pineal and it ended up working out? If there's no honest research out there then how did anyone come to figure out pineal calcification was bad in the first place?

[–] • 1 pt

Did you just take someone's word for it that you need to do x and y to decalcify the pineal and it ended up working out?

More or less. But, in the beginning I only ever saw mention of the subject in more esoteric places or places that discussed what normies tend to call "paranormal". I eventually grew intrigued enough that I sought out certain people, people that proved competence to me in such a range of areas that I was entirely dumbfounded. These kinds of people know more than I know about any one subject, but in such a range of areas that it very seriously doesn't seem like they're real. The biggest hurdle for me in the beginning was taking in everything I was being told. Naturally, I'm extremely skeptical and so it took me a while to really trust what they said or try things out they suggested.

After seeing vague reference to some of the things they appeared to have deep insight with in quite a few places, I began just taking supplements in the beginning, stopped using fluoridated toothpaste and tried in other ways to decrease my exposure. After a while, I started to actually feel differences.They aren't all that noticeable at first, but once you really get in to it, meaningful differences arise.

It's my estimation at least a couple of these people have had information sources of the more secret variety, but I'm not sure how helpful speculating will end up being here, as I'm not sure the source of this info really matters so much as the result of knowing it.

Either way, what do you have to lose with taking a few supplements, switching tooth pastes, taking shorter showers, etc? This really isn't that much of a trade off to potentially have what others tend to vaguely describe as "superpowers".