NoFap launches defamation suit | Poal: Say what you want.

1.2K

•

Apparently NoFap's founder is suing someone over defamation. Here is a link to their where you can donate to help, but I'm more interested in what's below. It seems like when you publicly advocate against porn you can attract the attention of some very unsavory people.

Lawsuit: https://nofap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Alexander-Rhodes-vs-Nicole-Prause-and-Liberos-LLC.pdf

Beginning on October 27, 2018, the day of the shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue, Defendant Prause escalated her attacks on Plaintiff Rhodes and NoFap, beginning in a Twitter thread. See Twitter Conversations, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

Defendant Prause’s posts falsely allege, among other things, that Plaintiff Rhodes:
a. Threatened to stalk Defendant Prause
b. Cyberstalks Defendant Prause and other women
c. Harasses Defendant Prause
d. Is subject to no-contact/restraining orders
e. Is misogynistic
f. Promotes the “Proud Boys” and works with multiple members of the group

Defendant Prause also accuses NoFap of being a hate group, that NoFap promotes discrimination against protected groups, that NoFap advertises multiple antisemitic groups, and that by visiting NoFap people are supporting misogyny and antisemitism.

Not sure what to make of the Tree of Life Synagogue reference in the suit. Seems unrelated unless I missed one of her tweets connecting that, but whatever.

Here are the tweets they referenced: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/1_-Alex-Rhodes-EXHIBIT-1-21-PAGES.pdf.
She seems to continually threaten to turn the police on people who criticize her.

in general is very interesting. She's steeped in the world of credentials and authority, contributes quotes to magazines like cosmo, and is currently complaining about receiving death threats and calling this a nuisance/frivolous lawsuit.

Outside of all of this Prause apparently has a lot of history accusing various anti-porn advocates and researchers of stalking her. There is too much here to even go into in this post, so I'll just link to .

Finally, an image that has nothing to do with anything: https://pic8.co/sh/cPGywT.jpg

Apparently NoFap's founder is suing someone over defamation. Here is a link to their [funding page](https://nofap.com/defend-alex/) where you can donate to help, but I'm more interested in what's below. It seems like when you publicly advocate against porn you can attract the attention of some very unsavory people. Lawsuit: https://nofap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Alexander-Rhodes-vs-Nicole-Prause-and-Liberos-LLC.pdf >Beginning on October 27, 2018, the day of the shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue, Defendant Prause escalated her attacks on Plaintiff Rhodes and NoFap, beginning in a Twitter thread. See Twitter Conversations, attached hereto as Exhibit 1. >Defendant Prause’s posts falsely allege, among other things, that Plaintiff Rhodes: >a. Threatened to stalk Defendant Prause >b. Cyberstalks Defendant Prause and other women >c. Harasses Defendant Prause >d. Is subject to no-contact/restraining orders >e. Is misogynistic >f. Promotes the “Proud Boys” and works with multiple members of the group >Defendant Prause also accuses NoFap of being a hate group, that NoFap promotes discrimination against protected groups, that NoFap advertises multiple antisemitic groups, and that by visiting NoFap people are supporting misogyny and antisemitism. Not sure what to make of the Tree of Life Synagogue reference in the suit. Seems unrelated unless I missed one of her tweets connecting that, but whatever. Here are the tweets they referenced: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/1_-Alex-Rhodes-EXHIBIT-1-21-PAGES.pdf. She seems to continually threaten to turn the police on people who criticize her. [Her twitter](https://twitter.com/NicoleRPrause) in general is very interesting. She's steeped in the world of credentials and authority, contributes quotes to magazines like cosmo, and is currently complaining about receiving death threats and calling this a nuisance/frivolous lawsuit. Outside of all of this Prause apparently has a lot of history accusing various anti-porn advocates and researchers of stalking her. There is too much here to even go into in this post, so I'll just link to [one of YourBrainOnPorn's rundowns](https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/nicole-prause-david-ley-defame-harass-alex-rhodes-nofap/). Finally, an image that has nothing to do with anything: https://pic8.co/sh/cPGywT.jpg

[–] • 3 pts

Mind Geek is the comapny that controls most of the free porn on the Internet. They work hand in hand with human traffickers. If you try to start your own porn company, their Mossad friends start following you in black van and will co-opt your business. I'm 100% serious.

link

[–] • 3 pts

This is such an odd case because the person in question at least appears highly intelligent and functional, but the behavior pattern appears totally pathological. Leads one to believe it's actually calculated and nefarious.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

That woman, Nicole Prause, is known to me from older research. I started looking her up and all the links were purple. It's been a while, though, so I am going to have to dig up what I was onto.

parent
link

[–] • 3 pts

Ok, I'm starting to remember...

She is all about the "masturbation as medicine" and trying to train people to build their identity based on their sexuality. She has some questionable ties to Pizzagate players but nothing I was able to prove definitively enough that would be worthy to print. But, she is back on my watchlist, now.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

https://www.todaysgeneralcounsel.com/two-porn-academics-in-legal-slugfest/

When it comes to claims and counterclaims about pornography, Nicole Prause and Donald Hilton have been at near opposite ends of the spectrum, and now they are in a head-to-head legal battle. As an academic, Prause has been skeptical about the prevailing notion that pornography can be thought of as an addiction, in one published paper characterizing the treatment industry as an emperor that has no clothes. Professionally, she has held positions as “neuroscientist, sexual psychophysiologist, statistician/Data Scientist, and most recently as founder of a sexual biotechnology company,” according to the company’s website. Her opponent Donald Hilton is an adjunct associate professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA) and the author of the he 2009 book He Restoreth My Soul: Understanding and Breaking the Chemical and Spiritual Chains of Pornography Addiction Through the Atonement of Jesus Christ. This article from Reason is a skeptical look at both their legal claims, but it’s particularly skeptical regarding Prause’s complaint against Hilton, which was in the form of a sexual harassment claim proffered to the University of Texas, in an attempt to get them to investigate Hilton (they declined). The Reason article quotes First Amendment expert, journalist and UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, making the case that Prause’s claim, which invokes a number of things she alleges Hilton said about her, is essentially a defamation case. She has couched it as sexual harassment, Volokh suggests, probably because that’s a type of complaint that universities will look into these days and to skirt what some believe are First Amendment constraints on making defamation cases in general.

link

[–] • 1 pt

I wonder if Hilton declined to provide Reason with a photo or something. For whatever reason they just went on Youtube and snagged a screencap of him with his mouth open.

As for the other claims Prause attributes to Hilton, she said "many written, spoken and audio records exist." In a 2016 talk to the Northwest Coalition for Healthy Intimacy, for example, Hilton noted that Prause had trained at the Kinsey Institute, then proceeded to fault Alfred Kinsey for studying "child sexuality" and pedophiles as part of the research discussed in his 1948 book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. While Hilton clearly was trying to taint researchers like Prause with what he considers to be Kinsey's morally abhorrent legacy, that's not quite the same as saying that she "molest[s] children in [her] laboratory"—the claim that Prause attributed to Hilton in her April 16 email.

This kind of turns my stomach if she made up this detail.

And that tweet she wrote -- "I think Jeanne's story I heard at AVN was amazing." -- a trap?

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, you're onto it.

You got me wondering about the polar extremes running into each twice in almost the same harassment lawsuits. Because we should always be asking ourselves, "To what extent is this a staged media narrative?"

She was definitely at the AVN awards.

https://pic8.co/sh/b8rltW.jpeg

I dig up some of her funding, but it is quite the web from the Medical Industrial Complex. Definitely, she is getting some Israeli funding, but they are layering it through NORD and other groups. It's harder to trace her money once it goes international, but it looks like some pharma is involved.

Philosophically, I'm opposed to a lot of what she stands for, so I have to check myself and my bias when digging. I prepared for myself that Hilton was a quack... but between her being at the AVN awards... like Hilton said and this:

https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/make-more-love-not/science-of-sex-nicole-prause-ROA_mEqh91J/

It turns out she is a disciple of Kinsey and Hilton is telling the truth.

So, she is a raging DARVO bitch who deserves every lawsuit who comes her way. She is using victim status and her pussy pass to get away with just what we get to see in public view from the Internet. My spider sense tingles as I research what she has going on.

Between Kinsey, AVN and Israeli pharma connections, I think we are well informed enough to call this woman the bad guy. I made a script to dig up whatever is going on with her, so I imagine in a day or two I'll have more to say about it. Maybe worthy of a short Poalcast snippet.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Just got around to listening to the podcast. Kinky stuff.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

I am looking forward to it. Sort of. I can't really get past the claim she apparently made up about herself that she attributed to Hilton.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

What is it with the left and wanting to be a part of everyone's personal lives. Who the fuck cares if someone jerks it or not? Why is someone saying well maybe you shouldn't a problem?

link

[–] • 5 pts

Well, because they farm sexual energy from people like the ones who excessively masturbate, the ones that most frequent the MindGeek machine.

It's literally as simple as Libido Dominandi. They use sex addicts like the alcohol industry uses drunks, the gambling industry uses gamblers or how the shopping industry uses women in general.

Think about those sad puppy commercials, the ones where they play sad songs and shoe a bunch of pictures of one legged dogs. Their biggest target is women on their period, or lonely women with an empty bottle of wine in front of them.

It's a great time to understand what the word loosh means.

parent
link

[–] • 5 pts

This comment is harassment. Are you familiar with California cyberstalking law? A police report has just been filed with your name have fun with that.