Can you provide me with any evidence of there being a coordinated attack on the legitimacy of the Q anon narrative? Literally anything would be useful. I'm not dismissing the existence of shill operatives and agenda pushers, I'm just saying you need to give us more than "my gut says so" because that means you're admitting that the information you claim to know is based on emotional feedback rather than anything based in physicality. I want some tangible, even if it's circumstancial I.E. "this user is able to post 24/7 without breaks" or "this user actively avoids X topic in Y discussion".

People do things to make the words appear on screen.

But you are stupid enough to fall for a (((psyop))).