uhm... ok. So you concede that Epstein had "sex slaves", but you doubt the quantity of this specific benzodiazepine used to sedate them? Or do you doubt that the "slaves" required sedation and that their participation was largely voluntary? Gimme something to work with here. Help me understand why you question to the veracity of the story or why it fails to adequately sensationalize this one feature of the Epstein affair.