Yeah exactly, it's irrelevant but ALSO just 100% wrong. There was no gun. Which of course, the retard (((journalist))) got completely wrong, probably to push gun bans, kek.
It's almost like they just wanted to slip the word "gun" into the story for some reason.
I'd wager anything that articles/videos about attacks involving guns get more hits than attacks involving only knives. Throw the word "gun" to describe the shape of a handle (which is retarded in its own right- there are no "gun shaped" handles, closest approximation would be "pistol grip" or something like that- still irrelevant) and now your article is tagged as "gun crime". Bigger audience reached, more hits, ???, profit.
Now I want a bayonet-pistol. Or do I want a pistol-bayonet? IDK, but the more fucked up looking the better.
They didn't even describe it as a gun shaped handle (which I mean, it is) they described it as a "knife inside of a gun" which is FAR more retarded considering it's just a knife blade with a gun-shaped handle (did you see the picture?).
There's a picture of it and it's basically a folding knife with a plastic replica of a handgun as the grip. Still not accurate to call it a gun though.
(post is archived)