WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

881

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

It’s should always be a choice. But informed consent is also attached to that Nuremberg medical code. (This is why you hear all the fast speaking nasty side effects on every other ad that happens to try to sell drugs.) So when he says it’s a choice. Then goes on to say that “safe and effective” doesn’t really get his ass out of the noose. But then again, he’s also no medical “expert”. There is going to be a hot potato when the cards fall about this phony pandemic, and the real dangers of this experimental shot. This seems like he’s trying to pass that hot potato on. Or he doesn’t want big pharm media machine on him. And I bet there’s people out there that thing it should be a choice but we’re also dumb enough to get it. So maybe he’s trying not to discourage the ones on the fense. Even though that statement might get dumb asses to finally take the full shots. If 187m are gonna die from malpractice and fabricated fear. Might as well be dumb asses and negros. Majority of Israel is vaccinated. Their hospitals are filling up. So who fucking cares. If it remains a solid choice.

[–] 0 pt

"Safe and effective" hasn't been proven.

[–] 0 pt

It’s safe for liability reason because you can’t sue for damages. And effective in wiping out populations.