He's a kike gaslighting that is all. His argument is circular or paradoxical and he will always and only be in favor when rights give him more power to strip you of rights he doesn't want you a goy to have. Their primary tactic are circular arguments, language loophole exploitation and redefinition. He affirms his right to discriminate while disaffirming your right to privacy. He has no morals or belief in any rights for goy and will argue one position while it's in his favor and when it's not he will argue from the other position.
I've learned a lot about rhetoric and logical argumentation the last couple years. It really makes dog shit arguments like the one that oven dodger is using easy to BTFO.
Always start with the premises. That will inform you as to weither or not an argument is even being made in good faith. In this case, it was obviously not, so I can just ridicule and move on.
(post is archived)