He's a kike gaslighting that is all. His argument is circular or paradoxical and he will always and only be in favor when rights give him more power to strip you of rights he doesn't want you a goy to have. Their primary tactic are circular arguments, language loophole exploitation and redefinition. He affirms his right to discriminate while disaffirming your right to privacy. He has no morals or belief in any rights for goy and will argue one position while it's in his favor and when it's not he will argue from the other position.

I agree with you. It's sad that Kristi Noem is using the exact reasoning you replied to as why she is not supporting a ban.