WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

520

(post is archived)

[–] -1 pt

The glowBI had a military drone (not unreasonable) flying over Kenosha at the precise moment and positioning to get a clear overhead shot of specifically Rittenhouse in a manner that makes him look bad. All released a year later

Okay.

*and was pointing at the correct positioning relative to it's location

This is a fucking joke.

[–] 1 pt

Why would the FBI monitor a riot and focus on an arson incident and a subsequent firefight. Mystery indeed.

It could be fake, wouldn't surprise me, but fixed wing surveillance aircraft are easily capable of what you're trying to make out as laughable.

[–] 0 pt

...but fixed wing surveillance aircraft are easily capable of what you're trying to make out as laughable.

Sure. As targeted surveillance. Not as a moving surveil and fly operation. Then it's FOV is too small to mean anything. Coupled with the dubious claim that people can be positively identified in the dark of night with IR is laughable as fuck.

So sure. They exist and can monitor a sandjew tent city. Awesome. A single moving target that isn't known to be an interesting party due to being in no way involved in any major incident specific to surveilling? Rofl. Also keep in mind that where this (the shootings) h appened, merely a few hundred yards away were ENORMOUS groups of police and military. I do not believe for a single iota of a moment that's where the glowBI would be flying it and watching.

[–] 0 pt

Identifying someone at the time? No, I doubt it. Are they claiming that?

Identifying someone afterwards based on correlating footage from the ground? Sure.

They would have seen the flare of the fire Jew#1 set. Then they would have seen flashes from Rittenhaus's rifle. Plenty of reason to follow it and see what was unfolding.

[–] 0 pt

There’s already clear video of the incident because someone was live streaming on foot. I’ve seen it.