In any case, your objection is weird and likely wrong. Jury verdicts are routinely overturned; this is called the appeals process.
Which is done when the state does something illegal with regard to the court fuckery. Not because a fragile nigger doesn't want to survive in a 3-star hotel of prison. Not because the (((appeals court))) says "HURRRRRRRRRRRRRR YOU MURDERED HER BUT YOU ONLY MEANT TO MURDER JUST HER SO YOU A GUD BOI!!!"
It's retarded. I should have been more specific, so you're correct there. But this entire ordeal is wrong.
>In any case, your objection is weird and likely wrong. Jury verdicts are routinely overturned; this is called the appeals process.
Which is done when the state does something illegal with regard to the court fuckery.
Not because a fragile nigger doesn't want to survive in a 3-star hotel of prison.
Not because the (((appeals court))) says "HURRRRRRRRRRRRRR YOU MURDERED HER BUT YOU ONLY MEANT TO MURDER JUST HER SO YOU A GUD BOI!!!"
It's retarded. I should have been more specific, so you're correct there. But this entire ordeal is wrong.
If the claim is that this was a major injustice by the courts, then yes. The diversity hire should have been executed.
If the claim is that this was a major injustice by the courts, then yes. The diversity hire should have been executed.
Yeah. I get way ahead of myself sometimes.
Yeah. I get way ahead of myself sometimes.
(post is archived)