you can overrule a jury verdict
No. No you can not. Look up jury nullification. Actual guilt has nothing to do with what the jury decides the verdict is.
The ruling said that for a third-degree murder charge, or “depraved-mind murder,” the person’s mental state must show a “generalized indifference to human life,” which cannot exist because Noor’s actions were directed at a single person.
That is some judaism right there. This ruling opens up ALL murder as a legal act.
So cops are allowed to carry guns in some unusual places in order to protect themselves. Beyond that I don't see why they should have any special privileges. It's not their god damn job to shoot people. If you are getting shot at or charged with a knife or whatever, anyone can shoot back. "I was scurred" wouldn't work for any of us, and it shouldn't work for them.
>The ruling said that for a third-degree murder charge, or “depraved-mind murder,” the person’s mental state must show a “generalized indifference to human life,” which cannot exist because Noor’s actions were directed at a single person.
Interesting. So the Nazis that operated their bear/eagle pens and lethal masturbation machines did not show a generalized indifference to human life, because it was directed only at jews. Very interesting.
you can overrule a jury verdict
Yeah, that's not a quote from the copy in the article. Was it spoken in an embedded video?
In any case, your objection is weird and likely wrong. Jury verdicts are routinely overturned; this is called the appeals process.
You have no clue what you're talking about.
In any case, your objection is weird and likely wrong. Jury verdicts are routinely overturned; this is called the appeals process.
Which is done when the state does something illegal with regard to the court fuckery. Not because a fragile nigger doesn't want to survive in a 3-star hotel of prison. Not because the (((appeals court))) says "HURRRRRRRRRRRRRR YOU MURDERED HER BUT YOU ONLY MEANT TO MURDER JUST HER SO YOU A GUD BOI!!!"
It's retarded. I should have been more specific, so you're correct there. But this entire ordeal is wrong.
If the claim is that this was a major injustice by the courts, then yes. The diversity hire should have been executed.
(post is archived)