Another little signpost on the road to Hell.
Another little signpost on the road to Hell.
the final insult
the final insult
Cancel culture at its finest: harmful to who?
Cancel culture at its finest: harmful to who?
Harmful to WHOM*
REEeeeEEEeeeeeEe..
Harmful to WHOM*
REEeeeEEEeeeeeEe..
Lol
Lol
Grammar realists
Grammar realists
Lol, I always forget the rule it’s whom if it’s for him/her and who for he/she. Unfortunately, if you get it right and use “whom” properly you can come across as pretentious, “oh look at you, someone paid attention during grammar lessons, la de da!”
Lol, I always forget the rule it’s whom if it’s for him/her and who for he/she. Unfortunately, if you get it right and use “whom” properly you can come across as pretentious, “oh look at you, someone paid attention during grammar lessons, la de da!”
Easy way: replace the who/whom with a he/him, and see which one. Then use "whom" if you used "him". Even if you have to juggle the sentence a bit. If it's a question with who/whom, answer it (with he/him) and then stick "whom" in if you answered with "him".
Easy way: replace the who/whom with a he/him, and see which one.
Then use "whom" if you used "him". Even if you have to juggle the sentence a bit.
If it's a question with who/whom, answer it (with he/him) and then stick "whom" in if you answered with "him".
Its quite amazing, how they turned "being well spoken, and knowing thy language" into "look at that fucking knowitall. Lol whata fag!"
Its quite amazing, how they turned "being well spoken, and knowing thy language" into "look at that fucking knowitall. Lol whata fag!"
Haha.
Haha.
Niggers. It overvalues them
Niggers. It overvalues them
Call out the pussies.
Make fun of them for it.
They are their own worst enemies!
Tell them tuff shit, the Constitution is non-negotiable.
Including the language and intent.
Call out the pussies.
Make fun of them for it.
They are their own worst enemies!
Tell them tuff shit, the Constitution is non-negotiable.
Including the language and intent.
If it was on there before its not now
If it was on there before its not now
EDIT: As per u/Hoppes9, this was the wrong page to see the addition. https://archive.fo/JOL2K
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
If it was there, it's been removed. Lemme see...
https://archive.fo/RKqaN - message not there as of Sep 2nd. If it was there, it can't have been for long.
**EDIT:** As per u/Hoppes9, this was the wrong page to see the addition. https://archive.fo/JOL2K
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
If it was there, it's been removed. Lemme see...
https://archive.fo/RKqaN - message not there as of Sep 2nd. If it was there, it can't have been for long.
It's still there. You're looking at the transcription. Look at the actual archive images of the Constitution.
It's still there. You're looking at the transcription. Look at the actual archive images of the Constitution.
http://catalog.archives.gov/id/1667751
Oho. Thank you.
Really odd that it'd be there only and not in the transcript as well.
Edit:
Oho. Thank you.
Really odd that it'd be there only and not in the transcript as well.
Edit: [The version with the warning was already added to the archive.](https://archive.fo/JOL2K)
At first I thought it was just a generic banner on the site, but other documents don't have it.
At first I thought it was just a generic banner on the site, but other documents don't have it.
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1501900
(post is archived)