Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

717

(post is archived)

[–] • 16 pts 3y

I’m surprised this came from California.

[–] • 4 pts 3y

Not everyone is scared of trannies

[–] • 3 pts 3y

Yes, but in general California seems to love them far more that it should.

[–] • 6 pts 3y (edited 3y)

Maybe the court was packed with women who have now a problem with trannies... Cheating husbands maybe... Daughter getting rekt on the playing field... Or maybe it's just all about the money for a change. Or maybe it's a bit of all of that, who knows...

...

The State of California Third District Court of Appeals ruled that a state law requiring the use of preferred pronouns by nursing home workers violated their free speech rights.

The court struck down the pro-transgender regulation on Friday in a unanimous 3-0 decision .

The provision was a part of the LGBTQ Long-Term Care Facility Residents' Bill of Rights passed in 2017 and signed into law by then-Governor Jerry Brown. The bill's author, state senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), released a statement lambasting the decision.

"The Court's decision is disconnected from the reality facing transgender people," said senator Weiner .

Oh yeah, I'm sure it's the court that is disconnected from reality here. Weiner fuckingfucks...

"Deliberately misgendering a transgender person isn't just a matter of opinion, and it's not simply 'disrespectful, discourteous, or insulting.' Rather, it's straight up harassment," he continued.

"And, it erases an individual's fundamental humanity, particularly one as vulnerable as a trans senior in a nursing home ," Weiner concluded. "This misguided decision cannot be allowed to stand."

Oh the humanity!

The law could have punished a health care provider with a year in prison and as much as a $1,000 fine for "prolonged" abuse involving the violation of the provisions including the misuse of preferred pronouns. Sponsors of the bill defended the bill by saying such a punishment would be rarely enforced in only the most extreme cases.

Equality California, who sponsored the legislation, also released a statement through a spokesperson decrying the unanimous ruling by the court.

"Let's be clear: refusing to use someone's correct name and pronouns isn't an issue of free speech — it's a hateful act that denies someone their dignity and truth," said Rick Chavez Zbur, an executive director of Equality California.

Zyklon mass murder and niggers in cages!

"California's nursing home patients deserve better than this — and we'll be fighting until this decision is overturned," he added.

Just shoot the trannies with moderna already you biggot!

↓ expand content
[–] • 1 pt 3y

I think many courts rulings have changed since Gishlane Maxwell has been imprisoned.

I think many many judges may have been being blackmailed.

[–] • 7 pts 3y

Imagine that.... compelled speech isn't free speech. Who would have thought.

Faggots still don't realize that there is no such thing as "hate speech." There is only "speech I hate to hear."

[–] • 4 pts 3y

It has to be compelled because it's not grounded in reality. Even the transgenders can't agree on pronouns so they agree to disagree on speech. This is a modern Tower of Babel. Making someone else speak your personal spiritual beliefs is tyranny. Transgendersim is the alleged gender of the spirit aside from all physical reality.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts 3y

There's no such thing as hate ______. Hate speech, hate crimes - it's all bullshit.

[–] • 1 pt 3y

It’s nigger bullshit

[–] • 0 pt 3y

Affirmative action for white defendants

[–] • 2 pts 3y

Unfortunately courts have not ruled hate speech laws unconstitutional which they should.

[–] • 0 pt 3y

Would be an open-and-shut case if someone would push it that far. SCOTUS ruled unanimously (yes, even (((Ginsburg)))) in Matal v Tam that "hate speech" does not exist in the legal sense.

[–] • 1 pt 3y

The more I see people trying to get rid of our rights the more pro genocide I become

[–] • 6 pts 3y

"Let's be clear: refusing to use someone's correct name and pronouns isn't an issue of free speech — it's a hateful act that denies someone their dignity and truth," said Rick Chavez Zbur, an executive director of Equality California."

Hateful acts that deny dignity and truth are protected by the 1st amendment as free speech and free expression.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts 3y

Leftists always think that the only ideas that merit protection are theirs.

[–] • 3 pts 3y (edited 3y)

People are allowed to have their own truth. It's called spirituality. But God's truth is manifest in the world he created. Speaking in secular terms grounded in physical reality is speaking in a subset of God's terms. Forcing your own reality is futile and leads to confusion among men. This is the lesson of the tower of Babel IMHO. Transpeople can't agree on their pronouns so they have a different language for each person. I'm sure that tower also had individualized terms for impossible structures. But that is my spirital truth and I wouldn't force it on someone. Every person can make their own spiritual observations so there's no need to force someone to say what can be clearly seen.

[–] • 5 pts 3y

demanding the rest of us play along with their delusion is unacceptable

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt 3y

best and most succinct statement on this matter. i think i am going to get a white tee shirt out and write it on the front in bold black permanent marker.

[–] • 0 pt 3y

The ones indoctrinating kids and the evil people allowing it should be lynched.

[–] • 2 pts 3y

Can I say faggot now?

[–] • 1 pt 3y

"Law requiring compelled speech somehow violates the first amendment"

Ya don't say?

[–] • 1 pt 3y

trans senior in a nursing home

Bahahaha, sure. Living right down the hall from Senior Sasquatch and the retired Tooth Lady

[–] • 0 pt 3y

Let’s work on the niggers beating the shit out of elderly patients in nursing homes, then we can talk about tranny shit again. Spoiler alert: the answer will still be no.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt 3y

Remember too that this is in nursing homes, which house dementia patients who are certain that the Staff has been tarnishing their silver while they sleep. Most nursing home workers have had to deal with false accusations from dementia patients. Handing ammunition to crazy old people to use against their care workers is irresponsible.

Load more (7 replies)