I don't see anything in the pic, or the related article (theguardian.com) to support your title.
What I see is the Guardian is reporting on a pretty ballsy "social experiment", and asking the reader if white people should pay more to promote reader interest. It does set an interesting (bad) precedent: definitely wouldn't be the same deal if a white business owner had come up with a justification for making black customers pay more.
I don't see anything in the pic, or the [related article](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/mar/18/new-orleans-chef-food-experiment-black-white-pay-more) to support your title.
What I see is the Guardian is reporting on a pretty ballsy "social experiment", and asking the reader if white people should pay more to promote reader interest. It does set an interesting (bad) precedent: definitely wouldn't be the same deal if a white business owner had come up with a justification for making black customers pay more.
What’s a narrative for $5, Patrick.
What’s a narrative for $5, Patrick.
No shortage around here.
No shortage around here.
Tyrones don’t have enough brain power to figure out those racist ideas. Their plantation (((masters))) are always the ones behind suggesting.
Tyrones don’t have enough brain power to figure out those racist ideas. Their plantation (((masters))) are always the ones behind suggesting.
(post is archived)