WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

I fully support this. Let the free market allow these racist signalers to go out of business by their own hand. But I suspect there will be "reverse" lawsuits by the shop owners when they start to fail, and possibly govt support to keep them open. Dey keepin da white man down.

[–] 2 pts

I already dont patronize anything ran by blacks just because they are all unemployed welfare whores around my local area. I guess i would just have to purposefully avoid doing any business with them in the future if they got jobs. Maybe i should refuse to sell them things on EBT from now on "sorry systems down, dunno whats up with it"

[–] 2 pts

I... think that's illegal, Guardian. You know, the Civil Rights Act and all that jazz.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Then when the business fails because no white people shop there, it will be white people's fault.

[–] 0 pt

I don't see anything in the pic, or the related article (theguardian.com) to support your title.

What I see is the Guardian is reporting on a pretty ballsy "social experiment", and asking the reader if white people should pay more to promote reader interest. It does set an interesting (bad) precedent: definitely wouldn't be the same deal if a white business owner had come up with a justification for making black customers pay more.

[–] 0 pt

What’s a narrative for $5, Patrick.

[–] 0 pt

No shortage around here.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Tyrones don’t have enough brain power to figure out those racist ideas. Their plantation (((masters))) are always the ones behind suggesting.