No they didn't. 230 mil? Chump change. And no they aren't barred. J&J has a bazillion different companies. None of those are barred from shit.
The problem isn't with the pain killers being available.
Its that they were pushed on those who didn't need them.
Marketing drugs on TV used to be illegal. Reagan made it legal. Reagan really fucked a lot of things up in retrospect (and I naively supported reagan ).
He was controlled by Jew Lou Wasserman who ran Universal in Hollywood and who paid Reagan off by selling him his ranch land under market where Reagan is now buried.
Now of course it was actually doctor payoffs which got them to prescribe unneeded opiodes but still.
And it was actually the jewish Sackler family who was apparently the worst .
Time for another company to do it then..why don't they just ban them all in the same manner?
why don't they just ban them
The thing with opiates is they are a very useful type of drug. Pure opium is not that damaging compared to many other classes of drugs. In fact, pure opium is safer than Tylenol when taken continuously over the long term. Places where opium is available cheaply and in pure form (like Mongolia) have plenty of elderly addicts who have been using since their teens. Anyone who regularly used Tylenol for chronic pain is likely on the awaiting a liver transplant. The main problem with opiates is drug companies synthesizing and enhancing it (like fentanyl) and street level people adulterating it (like heroin).
Chronic pain can be massively debilitating. Giving someone a painkiller that doesn't wreck their body will sometimes allow them to recover and other time allow them to be functional for whatever life they still have left. Unfortunately, not everyone metabolizes opiates the same way, so some receive no pain relief from them and some others can become addicted very quickly.
As a society, we should try to minimize how many people are addicted or dependent on any substances. Unfortunately we have a thoroughly corrupt medical cartel operating in this country which is not concerned with our well being.
Unfortunately, not everyone metabolizes opiates the same way, so some receive no pain relief from them and some others can become addicted very quickly.
If only racial DNA testing was allowed.
I smoked opium a couple times when I was a kid. I found it to be quite "useful".
I'll have to take your word for it. By "useful" do you mean as a pain reliever? Have you ever taking prescription versions of opoids? If so, how did it compare as far a pain relief goes?
As someone who has been victimized by this medical cartel, is there a way I can protect myself from them when they have the backing of the police?
Ask lots of questions and treat them like used car salesman. Doubt everything they say and assume they're just trying to make money off of you. As far a meds go, always ask for generics and be skeptical of anyone who insists you use a specific brand. If you have had success with a particular med, don't let them experiment on you by changing to a different one.
Heard anything about AT 121 alternative?
https://www.mymatrixx.com/an-opioid-that-doesnt-cause-addiction-or-overdose/
From the article:
biggest obstacle to the usefulness of opioids: euphoria
Judging from the article, I'm going to guess AT 121 should be included in all the other synthesized opiates and should be avoided. Doctors will happily put people on anti depressants which fry their liver and kidneys while also increasing the suicide risk. God forbid the pain killer makes you feel good as well for no extra cost. Considering how toxic many classes of painkillers are, the notion that opiods making you feel good is a terrible side effect is laughable and should demonstrate how safe they really are.
Also, "it is 100 times more potent than morphine for pain relief" seems like another red flag. You don't need particularly high doses of morphine to be effective (assuming it provides you relief). Extremely potent meds vastly increase the odds of overdose and complicate proper tapering for those who attempt to get off the medication.
I'm surprised they handed this ruling down at all, rather than just giving them a small fine that amounts to less than 1% of one day's profits.
Probably taking one for the team so the attention is on them while the others operate with continued impunity.
Yup, here I am trying to figure out which mega-corp this helps out. Probably all of (((them))).
Yeah probably.
$230 million is a small fine. What the fuck are you on?
but they can't lobby
Says who? The settlement? hahahahahahahahahahahah
$230 million is a small fine.
In percentage terms it's the equivalent of fining a guy who makes $50k for $139.
$230 million is indeed a small fine given the amount of chaos these kikes have caused. They should be fucking hanged, not fined.
Too late for tens of thousands of addicts…. Will health over profit ever work in the US?
I am sure they made billions. Settlement probably shields them from further liability.
400 billion dollar company. That should take them all of ... 1 day to make back.
It's the percentage equivalent of sticking a guy who makes $50k with a $139 fine.
Millions are dead. Its too late
They also funded Wuhan lab. They funded the virus and the "cure".
230 million? they make that every minute
the money is now in selling narcan type solutions to the states for distribution.
(post is archived)